Analysis: Palestinian Islamic Jihad, even more extreme than Hamas

Ariel Levin-Waldman
August 07, 2022 at 02:25 AM

i24NEWS reporter

Attia Muhammed/Flash90Members of the Saraya al-Quds Brigades, the armed wing of Palestine Islamic Jihad, take part in a military parade, in Al-Shati refugee camp, west of Gaza City, on June 24, 2022.

We ‘don’t agree with Hamas’s idea of a long ceasefire with Israel,’ group’s former leader says

Considered more radical and extremist than even Hamas, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) has been fighting Israel almost from the moment it was spawned from the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood party in 1981.
Its charter calls for the total annihilation of Israel, and it rejects any political or peaceful solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Even a long-term cease-fire between Israel and Hamas, an idea sometimes floated in an effort to halt the violence, if even for a while, is anathema to the PIJ.

Former PIJ Leader Ramadan Shalah said in 2009 that while the PIJ and Hamas shared “the same Islamic identity,” they differed tactically.
“I don’t agree with Hamas’s idea of a long ceasefire with Israel, because Israel will only use the time to make things worse,” he declared.
This obduracy has put the PIJ at odds with Hamas, notably in 2019 after PIJ leader Baha Abu Al Ata was eliminated and the PIJ launched attacks on Israel even though Hamas didn’t want escalation.
Unlike Hamas, but like Hezbollah in Lebanon, PIJ is very much an Iranian proxy. Tehran supplies it with funding and weapons, notably Iranian-made missiles and advanced armed drones that Gaza militants cannot manufacture locally. The PIJ leadership is also in direct and regular contact with Iranian leaders.
Although primarily Gaza-based, the PIJ is also making inroads in the West Bank, its members regularly confronting the Israeli army during the latter’s almost-nightly search-and-arrest raids.
It was the arrest last week of PIJ West Bank head Bassam al-Saadi and his son-in-law which sparked the current tensions, as the PIJ vowed revenge, and Israel raised its alert level in the area adjacent to the Gaza Strip, and closed Gaza-area roads to civilian vehicles.
According to the army, at the start of Operation “Breaking Dawn,” the PIJ arsenal included around 5,500 rockets and missiles. While most are short or medium range, with a limit of up to 28 miles, the group also has several long-range systems, with ranges of up to 50 miles, which could hit Tel Aviv and its northern suburbs, or even Jerusalem.
To this can be added the formidable rocket arsenal of Hamas, (around 6,000 missiles, some with ranges of up to 125 miles) should it decide to join the fighting

... continue reading.

Analysis: Palestinian Islamic Jihad, even more extreme than Hamas Read More »

Will Hamas Distance Itself from Confrontation with Israel?

Sunday, 7 August, 2022 – 10:30 – www.aswasat.com

A fire near Sderot settlement caused by rockets fired from Gaza on Saturday, August 6, 2022. (Reuters)

Ramallah – Asharq Al-Awsat

Hamas movement, which has been ruling Gaza since 2007, has left the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) alone in confronting Israel’s attacks on the enclave.
This is not the first time that Hamas distances itself from such a confrontation, a tactic that Israel succeeded in imposing on the Strip twice, the first in 2019 and the second in the current ongoing war.
A flare-up with the PIJ came in 2019, following Israel’s killing of the commander in al-Quds Brigades, Baha Abu al-Ata. Hamas did not join the fray in that conflict.
Al-Quds Brigades is the armed wing of the group.
The Israeli army announced then that it was not targeting Hamas, urging the group not to take sides.
Ahead of Israel’s war on the PIJ, Hamas and Egypt pressured the group to avoid any military escalation.
Both sides called on the PIJ not to be triggered by Israel’s misleading narrative, in which it accused the Islamic Jihad of seeking revenge following the humiliating arrest of its senior leader, Bassam al-Saadi, in the West Bank last week.
Tel Aviv later launched a sudden attack killing several PIJ officials.
While Israel seems to have embarrassed the mediators, including Hamas, it was keen not to provoke it to ensure it remains on the sidelines for reasons related to power.
There is a significant difference between the PIJ and Hamas, which enjoys greater influence and acquires more military equipment, number of fighters, and developed arms.
However, will Hamas remain on the sidelines? It is still early to decide. Political Analyst Talal Awkal said the movement can not distance itself any longer.
He told Asharq Al-Awsat that Palestine seems to be following a specific tactic in its aggression, which has been recently launched.
“The factions decided they will not respond all together by using force.” Awkal explained, adding that they believe it will be a long war of attrition and that even the PIJ still hasn’t used its basic power.
“I think we are facing a gradual use of force and a response that expands to include the participation of the rest of the factions.”
He warned of the moral and political consequences of Hamas’ decision to remain distant and leave the PIJ alone in the confrontation with Israel.
“Last year, the resistance’s rhetoric was different, unified and loud and called for uniting efforts,” Awkal stressed, noting that there is no guarantee that the battle will remain against the Islamic Jihad only and within the enclave’s borders.
Al-Quds Brigades issued a statement on Saturday saying that as part of the Unity of Battlefields operation, it launched an attack, along with the National Resistance Brigades, the Mujahideen Brigades and the al-Aqsa Martyrs’ Brigades, targeting five Israeli settlements by salvo of rockets.
This statement could be aimed at pressuring Hamas to participate with the rest of the factions in the fight against Israel or showing that the factions are gradually taking part in the battle.
Israel is aware that Hamas’ participation will be the decisive factor that will determine the nature and duration of the battle.

... continue reading.

Will Hamas Distance Itself from Confrontation with Israel? Read More »

Hezbollah chief says organization stands with Islamic Jihad, Hamas and other Gaza factions

Liad Osmo|
Published: 08.06.22, 23:37 – YNetnews.com

 

Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah said on Saturday that his organization stand with the Palestinians factions in Gaza.
Speaking in a televised address, Nasrallah said the “resistance,” will have the upper hand.
“I am telling the enemy not to hold a mistaken view of Lebanon,” the leader of the Iran-backed group said. “Events in Gaza do not affect us and we are stronger than ever,” he said.

... continue reading.

Hezbollah chief says organization stands with Islamic Jihad, Hamas and other Gaza factions Read More »

Russia-Ukraine war leaves Hamas in financial crisis

The fragile Palestinian economy in the Gaza Strip has been largely affected by the Russian-Ukrainian war, which has caused price hikes and an increase in taxes.
 

A Palestinian police officer searches a truck’s fabrics cargo slated for export at the Kerem Shalom crossing, Rafah, Gaza Strip, June 21, 2021. – Said Khatib/AFP via Getty Images

 
Rasha Abou Jalal
@rashaaboujalal1

By Rasha Abou Jalal @rashaaboujala1
Al-monitor.com

August 8, 2022

GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip — The fragile Palestinian economy in the Gaza Strip has been drawn into a deep crisis in the wake of the Russian-Ukrainian war, which has caused price hikes, confusion in local fees and taxes imposed on goods, and lower public sector employees’ salaries.
The Hamas movement, which has been in control of Gaza since 2007, has recently adopted several measures to tackle this increase in prices. Back in June, Hamas started off by reducing taxes on basic commodities such as cooking gas, but it was not long before this measure backfired and led the movement to grapple with a stifling financial crisis, while it mainly relies on local taxes to cover its expenses.
To compensate for the reduced taxes on basic commodities, Hamas imposed new taxes on other goods such as imported clothes, and is considering slashing a bigger percentage of the salaries of its approximately 40,000 government employees, which has deepened the crisis instead of solving it.
Since Egypt demolished in 2013 the border tunnels with the Gaza Strip on which Hamas relied to smuggle goods and cover its finances, government employees have been receiving only 60% of their monthly salaries.
Awni al-Basha, undersecretary of the Gaza Finance Ministry, told Al-Monitor that the government is suffering from a stifling financial crisis that will negatively affect the salaries of its employees, as the government is bearing the rise in prices of basic commodities, especially fuel, as a result of the Russian-Ukrainian war.
Basha said that the government was forced during the past months to borrow from local banks in order to be able to cover the 60%, but it is no longer able to continue fulfilling this obligation.
He pointed out that the government has developed a plan to overcome this budget deficit through a set of austerity measures at the level of expenditures, operational budgets and development budgets.
Of note, Hamas does not disclose its tax revenues, expenditures or employee payroll bills.
Mohammed Abu Jiyab, editor of Al-Eqtesadia newspaper in Gaza, wrote in a Facebook post July 27, “I have a question for the government: what is the reason behind the decline in revenues, what is the percentage of this decline, and what are the most important revenue sources that decreased? Can the government tell us the size of the [amount it collects in taxes and fees] and how it classifies its resources, or is it forbidden?”
An official at the Ministry of Economy in Gaza told Al-Monitor on condition of anonymity that the tax revenues of the Hamas government amount to no more than roughly $40 million per month. He said, “The rise in fuel prices has led the government to lose $5 million per month in taxes, which, alone, plunged the government into a financial crisis.”
Salama Marouf, chairman of the Gaza government media office, told Al-Araby Al-Jadeed website July 27, “The government has reached a stage where it is impossible for it to cover 60% of the employees’ salaries.”
In a July 23 statement, the Public Employees Syndicate in Gaza expressed its categorical refusal of any proposals to reduce the public employees’ salary rate, as it stressed its insistence on increasing the 60% rate.
In order to confront this deficit in taxes and the crisis in paying employees’ salaries, the Ministry of Economy in Gaza announced in a July 19 statement the imposition of new taxes on imported items and goods.
The ministry explained that the decision aims to increase the competitiveness of local products in comparison with foreign products all the while increasing the number of industrial establishments, expanding existing factories and increasing the number of workers.
According to the decision, a tax of $3 will be imposed on each imported piece of trousers, jilbab (long and loose-fit coat) and abaya (long-sleeved, floor-length garment); $300 will be imposed as fees on each ton of nylon; $60 per ton of juice; $1,000 per ton of thyme or nuts; and $230 per ton of biscuits.
While local factory owners back the decision as it supports local products, the importing traders strongly reject it, and say it aims at reviving government revenues at their own expense.
Ziad al-Shanti, owner of Shanti Denim Factory in Gaza, welcomed the decision to impose new taxes on imported goods. He told Al-Monitor that the decision is in the interest of local products.
He noted that the local product is of high quality comparable to imported ones, “but people prefer to buy imported goods because there is a popular belief that imported products are always better than local ones, and that is wrong.”
He pointed out that imposing a new tax on imported goods would increase the price of imported goods and would make local products more attractive.
On July 21, clothing merchants and importers in the Gaza Strip organized a protest in front of their union headquarters in Gaza City in order to voice their opposition to the new taxes.
Emad Abdelhadi, representative of Gaza’s Union of Clothes’ Merchants, refused these taxes. He told Al-Monitor that the Ministry of Economy did not discuss such measures before imposing them, and that it came as a surprise to merchants who are facing the risk of bankruptcy due to the taxes imposed on their imported products.
Abdelhadi explained that about 800,000 pairs of trousers and 20,000 robes and abayas are imported on an annual basis.
He said that in order to support local products, the quantities of imported goods should be reduced and the quantities of local products increased. Increasing the customs value would only lead to increasing the price of imported products, which is something that would affect consumers in the first place.
Palestinian activists called for demonstrations in the Gaza Strip Aug. 5, dubbed as the “Friday of Dignity,” in rejection of the recent taxes introduced amid high unemployment and poverty rates in Gaza.
According to statistics published June 21 by the United Nations on the situation in the Gaza Strip, about 80% of Gazans depend on humanitarian aid, and more than half of the population of 2 million live in poverty, while roughly 80% of the youth are unemployed.

Read more: https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2022/08/russia-ukraine-war-leaves-hamas-financial-crisis#ixzz7bPCntMNk

... continue reading.

Russia-Ukraine war leaves Hamas in financial crisis Read More »

Hamas Tries to Bar News Coverage of ‘Rocket Malfunctions’ After Projectile Failures Kill Palestinians

By Patrick Goodenough | August 10, 2022 | 4:21am EDT – CNSNews.com

 
Journalists in Gaza City on Saturday. (Photo by Mohammed Abed / AFP via Getty Images)

 
(CNSNews.com) – Hamas, the U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organization that controls the Gaza Strip, issued an order prohibiting local journalists from reporting or facilitating reporting on several issues, including “rocket malfunctions,” according to an organization representing foreign media in Israel.
The Foreign Press Association (FPA) said Tuesday the Hamas authorities had asked Gaza-based journalists “to pledge not to report on – or allow foreign journalists to cover – rocket malfunctions, militant capabilities or their role in the build-up to the weekend’s conflict.”

It said that after it held discussions with the “authorities in Gaza,” the order was withdrawn.
“The FPA is pleased with that reversal and notes that such a move would have constituted a severe, unacceptable and unjustifiable restriction on the freedom of the press, as well as the safety of our colleagues in Gaza,” it said.
The episode, first reported by the Associated Press, came shortly after three days of violence between the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), a less-prominent but also Iranian regime-backed terrorist group active in Gaza.

In the fighting, the terrorists fired more than a thousand rockets towards Israel, and the IDF carried out airstrikes on Palestinian Islamic Jihad targets, including the targeted assassination of two senior terrorist commanders, Taysir al-Jabari and Khaled Mansour. Israeli officials said it launched the “pre-emptive” operation because the PIJ was planning a large terror attack inside Israel.
The Hamas-run health ministry said a total of 46 Palestinians were killed. According to information and photos posted by the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, 12 of them were the group’s fighters, “martyred” over the weekend. (The IDF deliberately avoided targeting Hamas, which stayed out of the fray.)

 
Palestinian Islamic Jihad fighters in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip on Monday. (Photo by Said Khatib / AFP via Getty Images)

Israel acknowledged that some Palestinian civilians, including children, were unintentionally killed as a result of its airstrikes against terror targets, an outcome Prime Minister Yair Lapid called “heartbreaking.”
According to the IDF, however, at least 15 of the Palestinian fatalities were civilians killed as a result of Palestinian Islamic Jihad rockets launched towards Israel, but falling short and landing in residential areas in Gaza.
Of 1,100 rockets launched by the group, the IDF said, more than 200 landed inside the strip.
On Tuesday, the Associated Press reported that the IDF assessment appeared to be consistent with its own reporting.
It cited two incidents in Jabaliya in northern Gaza – one on Saturday night and the other on Sunday night – in which a total of 12 Palestinians, including children, had been killed in two explosions. Neither bore hallmarks of an Israeli airstrike. In both cases the PIJ had announced barrages of rockets at the time, it said.

Foreign media outlets represented in Israel hire the services of Gaza-based reporters and translators to facilitate their reporting inside the enclave. The Hamas order evidently sought to put pressure on the Palestinians by putting the onus on them ensure the foreign journalists did not cover issues deemed unacceptable to the terrorist group.
“Even if the rules are officially withdrawn, Hamas has still signaled its expectations, which could have a chilling effect on critical coverage,” the AP said.
The weekend flare-up ended with an Egyptian-brokered ceasefire late on Sunday night.
In a statement welcoming the ceasefire, President Biden reiterated U.S. support for Israel’s “right to defend itself against attacks,” and called for investigations into civilian casualties in Gaza, “whether by Israeli strikes against Islamic Jihad positions or the dozens of Islamic Jihad rockets that reportedly fell inside Gaza.”

... continue reading.

Hamas Tries to Bar News Coverage of ‘Rocket Malfunctions’ After Projectile Failures Kill Palestinians Read More »

Tunisia: Administrative Court rejects 2 appeals against Constitution referendum results

August 6, 2022 at 12:56 pm | Published in: AfricaNewsTunisia

 TUNIS, TUNISIA – JULY 26: Farouk Bouasker, president of the  Independent High Authority for Elections, holds a press conference to announce the unofficial results of the 25 July referendum on the new constitution in Tunis, Tunisia on July 26, 2022. ( Yassine Gaidi – Anadolu Agency )

August 6, 2022 at 12:56 pm

The Administrative Court in Tunisia announced the issuance of two first instance judgements about the appeals against the results of the 25 July referendum. The judgements ruled on rejecting the appeal submitted by the I Watch organisation and accepting the appeal submitted by the Echaâb Yourid party in form and rejecting it in merit.
This came in a statement on Friday by the court published on its Facebook page.
The statement announced: “The Administrative Court announces that a judicial circuit, assigned to consider the appeals of the preliminary results of the 25 July referendum, issued its judgements regarding the two appeals submitted by the I Watch organisation and the Echaâb Yourid party.”
“Regarding the appeal submitted by I Watch, the court issued a first instance judgement of rejecting the appeal, and accepting the appeal submitted by the Echaâb Yourid party in form and reject it in merit,” the statement added without further details.
READ: Ghannouchi: Tunisia may ban Ennahda from running in elections, or dissolve it
The statement continued: “According to the provisions of Chapter 145 of the Electoral Law, the Administrative Court will inform the two judgements within three days of the date of their declaration.”
The statement pointed out that the concerned parties can challenge the aforementioned judgements before the judicial plenary session of the Administrative Court.
On 29 July, the Afek Tounes Party and the I Watch organisation announced their intention to submit appeals against the referendum on the new draft Constitution.
The Tunisian Administrative Court’s statement did not refer to any decision regarding the existence of an appeal submitted by the Afek Tounes party, which confirmed in a statement on Friday its insistence on the right to submit appeals against the results of the referendum.
On 26 July, the Independent High Authority for Elections (ISIE) announced the approval of the new draft Constitution after it gained the confidence of 94.60 per cent of voters in the referendum.
READ: Tunisia: General Labour Union threatens public sector strike
Several Tunisian political forces rejected the results of the referendum on the new Constitution, such as the National Salvation Front, the Ennahda Movement and the National Campaign to Overthrow the Referendum (a coalition of five left-wing parties), because 75 per cent of the Tunisian people did not participate in the referendum.
On 28 July, President of ISIE Farouk Bouaskar shared that 2,630,094 voters voted on the draft Constitution out of 9,278,541 voters (30.5 per cent of the registered).
The referendum is considered a part of a series of exceptional measures that President Kais Saied imposed on 25 July, 2021, including dismissing the government and appointing a new one, dissolving the Supreme Judicial Council and Parliament, issuing legislation by presidential decrees and setting an early date for the parliamentary elections to be on 17 December.

... continue reading.

Tunisia: Administrative Court rejects 2 appeals against Constitution referendum results Read More »

Tunisia: Ennahda urges government to announce reality of economy

August 6, 2022 at 1:33 pm

TUNIS, TUNISIA – JULY 26: Farouk Bouasker, president of the Independent High Authority for Elections, holds a press conference to announce the unofficial results of the 25 July referendum on the new constitution in Tunis, Tunisia on July 26, 2022. ( Yassine Gaidi – Anadolu Agency )

August 6, 2022 at 1:33 pm

The Ennahda Movement issued a statement on Friday calling on the Tunisian government to reveal the reality of the economic, financial and social situation and to “stop adopting misleading policies”.
The movement called on the country’s government: “To seriously focus on providing basic materials that have been absent for months, monitor random price increases, retreat from the price increases for school materials for this year and take into account the purchasing power of citizens.”
The movement also called on the authorities to: “Stop the populist discourse based on arbitrarily accusing the former governments of corruption and hinting of embezzling public money without providing any evidence.”
READ: Tunisia: Administrative Court rejects 2 appeals against Constitution referendum results
On Wednesday, President Kais Saied affirmed: “The necessity of activating the legal effects of every violation with regard to the donations that the people were supposed to benefit from.”
This came after Saied reviewed the report prepared by the Ministry of Finance on the results of the task of inventorying and controlling the status of loans and donations granted to the state and public institutions during the last ten years.
Saied considered that: “The numbers mentioned in the report are large, especially with regard to the donations that their natural beneficiary, the Tunisian people, were supposed to obtain.”
Tunisia is suffering an economic and financial crisis that has been exacerbated due to the repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russian war in Ukraine, in addition to the political instability that the country has experienced since President Saied imposed exceptional measures on 25 July, 2021.
READ: Ghannouchi: Tunisia may ban Ennahda from running in elections, or dissolve it
Last June, the annual inflation in Tunisia surged to its highest rate in three decades amid sharp increases in commodity prices, mainly caused by the repercussions of the war in Ukraine.
The National Institute of Statistics shared that annual inflation rose to 8.1 per cent last June, compared to 7.8 per cent in May.

... continue reading.

Tunisia: Ennahda urges government to announce reality of economy Read More »

Breaking Dawn Analysis: Iran is losing ground in the Middle East

Islamic Jihad is directly controlled by Iran.  It is an Iranian faction and its members are called “Palestine’s Shiites” by rivals. Op=ed.

Mudar Adnan Zahran – Israel National News – 
Aug 7, 2022, 7:00 PM (GMT+3)

Mudar Zahran

Israel recently killed a military leader of the Iran-backed Islamic Jihad terror group in Gaza. Tayseer al-Jabari, who was killed by an Israeli airstrike on 5 August, was the key military commander for the said group and has been considered the group’s leader since 2019. The killing was the first step in what Israel named Operation Breaking Dawn to target Islamic Jihad operations and installations in Gaza.
The timing of the killing and the launch of the operation remains a mystery to some because the Islamic Jihad was not engaged in launching rockets against Israel at the time and the front with Gaza has been quiet since the last major confrontation in May of 2021.
Further, many, including some Israelis, are upping the ante by suggesting the said killing has “unnecessarily” provoked a confrontation. This argument embodies what is wrong with most analysts and so-called experts of the Middle East, they look at tactics and details and fail to see the bigger picture. To understand the bigger picture, one must examine the facts.

First, the Islamic Jihad is an Iran-controlled terror group. The difference between the Islamic Jihad and Hamas is that Hamas is an ally of Iran while the Islamic Jihad is directly controlled by Iran. It is considered an Iranian faction and its members are described by their rivals as “Palestine’s Shiites”.
There is another difference, Hamas agreed to an Egyptian-brokered undeclared armistice with Israel in January and has kept quiet since then. The Islamic Jihad has not agreed to this armistice despite being ideologically aligned with Hamas. Hence, the Islamic Jihad was theoretically free to engage in a war with Israel.
Nonetheless, it was not this that exactly promoted Israel to launch this operation. The threat has always been there, and both main terror groups in Gaza have a bad history of keeping their promises.
The real reason Israel has launched this war has a lot to do with what happened in Iraq last week. Oil-rich Iraq was handed down to Iran when Saddam was toppled in 2003. Iran has been ruling Iraq since. I personally got to see this first hand when I was serving for the US Embassies in Amman and Baghdad as the assistant policy coordinator. Iran’s men took over the Iraqi government and parliament. Iraq’s wealth has been squandered by Iran’s agents and American-made weapons delivered to Iraq are used by radical Iraqi Shiite groups waving Iran’s flag.

Iran and her men have turned the formerly wealthy Iraqi nation into one of the poorest in the region. Iraqis have been impoverished by Iran in the name of sectarian Shiite loyalty. The Iraqi Shiite majority seem to have collectively come to the conclusion that they are being manipulated by Iran and have been warning they would revolt for two years.
On the first day of August, the explosion came too soon for Iran. Millions of Iraqis took to the streets of all major cities chanting “Iran out, Iran out, Baghdad will be free!”. In the capital Baghdad, peaceful Iraqi protesters stormed the Green Zone massive compound where main government buildings and embassies are situated. At the same time, thousands of Iraqis stormed the Iraqi Parliament and have not left yet as these lines are being written. Some protesters besieged the residence of former Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri Al-Malki who is considered Iran’s strongman. It turned out he escaped to an Arab Gulf country two days earlier in what was nothing less than a narrow escape for him.
The Iran-controlled Iraqi government and parliament have been brought to a total halt by the protesters. The Iraqi army and police have been supportive of protesters and facilitated their marches, and the man behind all of this is a relatively young Shiite cleric named Muqtada Al-Sadir.
Iraq’s top Shiite religious leader calling Iran out and ordering his faithful followers to march against Iran; bringing down its government and parliament; means Iran’s control of Iraq is officially done.

This painful hit at Iran was magnified by similar challenges to her control in the same week. Lebanese activists called for riots against Iran’s offshoot terror group, Hezbollah, which has been ruling Lebanon for two decades.
Iran is losing ground very fast in the region as Arab people are seeking independence from it and seeing her as the enemy rather than Israel.
With the swift and gigantic hit Iran received in Iraq last week, it had one playground left to shake, Gaza. If the Islamic Jihad were to take the advantage of starting the war with its senior command intact, Iran would have gained by showing that no peace could be made in Gaza without it.
Unsurprisingly, the Israelis seem to have known about Iran’s plans for Gaza and took the initiative by killing the mind behind the group, Al-Rajabi, who has no successor with similar capability or organizational skills. They continued by killing other Islamic Jihad leaders. If they have accomplished their plans to decimate the leadership ranks of Islamic Jihad, agreeing to a ceasefire is timely.
For now, the Islamic Jihad is a headless beast and cannot wreak any subnational havoc in Gaza. Hopefully, Iran will keep losing more ground in the Middle East region.
Mudar Adnan Zahranis the secretary General of the Jordan Opposition Coalitionl and a Palestinian Arab leader.

... continue reading.

Breaking Dawn Analysis: Iran is losing ground in the Middle East Read More »

Putin and Erdoğan agree to begin partial payment in rubles for Russian gas

News.Az

05 Aug 2022 22:47

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan have agreed that Turkey will pay Russia in rubles for partial gas supplies, News.az reports citing CNN.
The bilateral talks, held in Sochi, lasted over four hours on Friday.
“In the process of negotiations, the presidents agreed that they would start payment in rubles for partial gas supplies,” Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak told journalists after the meeting.
“We are talking about the transition to national currencies, and at the first stage, part of the supplies will be paid in Russian rubles. And this is really a new stage, new opportunities, including for the development of our monetary and financial relations,” Novak said.
Novak also said the two presidents reached agreements on establishing the financial banking bloc “to enable commercial companies, Russian citizens, to pay during tourist trips and exchange money.”
Putin and Erdoğan agreed to hold the next meeting of the Russian-Turkish High-Level Cooperation Council in Turkey.

... continue reading.

Putin and Erdoğan agree to begin partial payment in rubles for Russian gas Read More »

PML-N counting on parliament to pave way for Nawaz’s return

 Published August 7, 2022  

In this file photo, PML-N supremo Nawaz Sharif talks to media in London. — screengrab

LAHORE: The Pakistan Mus­lim League-Nawaz (PML-N) government is considering relevant legislation to ease the return of its supreme leader Nawaz Sharif, who is in a self-imposed exile in London on medical grounds, to Pakistan.
PML-N leader and interior minister Rana Sanaullah has already said the coalition government might make certain amendments that would help repeal the ban imposed on Mr Sharif by a Supreme Court judgement in the Panama Papers case against him.
“The parliament can undo the lifetime ban on politicians and it may not be struck down by the court,” an insider told Dawn.
“Nawaz Sharif will be the ultimate beneficiary if this legislation is brought to parliament and subsequently adopted,” the insider said, adding that the introduction of this legislation would be linked to the outcome of the Supreme Court Bar Association’s petition in the apex court challenging lifetime ban on politicians.

Earlier, PML-N Vice-President Maryam Nawaz had hinted that her father wanted to come back but there were ‘certain problems’ hindering his return. She was referring to legal problems as Nawaz Sharif will have to go to jail on his return in the Al Azizia corruption reference. Besides, she had also referred to not getting a ‘green light’ from the powerful circles for his return.
Sanaullah says party supremo will spearhead election campaign
After Shehbaz Sharif managed to become the premier in April last, some PML-N leaders were excited hoping that their supreme leader would now be among them soon.
But legal hiccups are said to be the main hurdles in his return plans.
Nawaz vs Imran
Nawaz Sharif will likely make his return to Pakistan ahead of the general elections as PML-N leaders think his presence in the field is necessary to stop Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) juggernaut.
In the face of the rising popularity of the PTI chairman who was ousted as the prime minister in April this year, the entire PML-N leadership is unanimous that the party needs Nawaz to be in Pakistan ahead of the polls if it wants to score a victory.
“Embarrassing defeat in the last month’s by-polls in Punjab has consolidated this view within the party that second-tier leadership like Maryam Nawaz and [PM] Shehbaz Sharif cannot compete with Mr Khan’s charisma,” an insider told Dawn.
Despite an aggressive campaign by Ms Nawaz, the PML-N faced a crushing defeat in the by-polls held on July 22 that cost Punjab to the Sharifs. “Only Nawaz can handle Imran Khan in the political field as per the PML-N senior leadership,” the insider added.
Meanwhile, Interior Minister Rana Sanaullah dismissed rumours about the immediate return of the elder Sharif. He, however, confirmed that Mr Sharif return ahead of the next general elections to spearhead the party’s campaign.
“There has been a talk in the party about the return of Nawaz Sharif. He is likely to return to Pakistan ahead of the next elections whenever they take place to spearhead the PML-N’s campaign,” Sanaullah said on a private TV channel.
Mr Sanaullah was referring to the claims made by PML-N leader Javid Latif who had claimed that Nawaz Sharif was thinking of coming back to Pakistan in mid-September.
Mr Latif has been passionately appealing to his party chief to come back before it is too late to counter Imran Khan.
Nawaz in London
An ‘ailing’ Nawaz Sharif has been living in London since November 2019 for medical treatment after the high court allowed him a four-week reprieve. He was serving seven-year imprisonment in the Kot Lakhpat Jail in Lahore in the Al-Azizia corruption case before his departure to London on medical grounds.
Prior to his exit, his younger brother Shehbaz had submitted an undertaking to the Lahore High Court ensuring his elder brother would return “within four weeks or on certification by doctors that he has regained his health and is fit to return back to Pakistan”. However, the return is repeatedly delayed due to health concerns.
Nawaz Sharif’s passport expired in February 2021. However, the junior Sharif’s government issued a fresh passport to the elder Sharif in April this year.
It may be mentioned here that in August last year, Nawaz Sharif filed an appeal with the British Immigration Tribunal after the Home Department refused to extend his stay in the country on “medical grounds” any further. Mr Sharif can legally remain in the UK till the tribunal issues its decision on his plea for his stay in the country.
Published in Dawn, August 7th, 2022

... continue reading.

PML-N counting on parliament to pave way for Nawaz’s return Read More »