1

JaFaJ

FM Vows to Uphold Iran’s Water Rights

August, 06, 2022 – 12:02  Tasnim News Agency
Politics news 

TEHRAN (Tasnim) – The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Iran will not budge an inch in the efforts to safeguard the country’s right to enjoy the share of water from joint and border resources, Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian said.
 

In a meeting with the members of the Iranian Parliament’s agriculture commission on Friday, Amirabdollahian outlined the Foreign Ministry’s activities during the past 11 months in regard to water diplomacy, environmental protection, the export of agricultural products and economic diplomacy.
Pointing to the plans to ensure Iran’s right to receive the share of water from the Hirmand and Aras border rivers, he emphasized that the Foreign Ministry will never abandon the efforts to protect even a single drop of water that Iran is entitle to get from the historical and border resources.
Amirabdollahian also noted that Iran has recently set up a joint water committee with Turkey for the first time to address issues relating to the share of water from the Aras river.
Last month, Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi assigned the ministers of Foreign Affairs and Energy to follow up on Iran’s water rights from the Hirmand river, saying, “The popular administration will not hesitate to pursue the rights of the nation in any way.”

... continue reading.

FM Vows to Uphold Iran’s Water Rights Read More »

Why did the Islamic Jihad agree to a ceasefire so quickly?

With the Israeli hits becoming more painful and on target,
Iran had no chance but to swallow its pride. Op-ed.

Mudar Adnan Zahran 
Aug 8, 2022, 10:14 PM (GMT+3) – Israelnationalnews.com 


On the third day of confrontations between Israel and the Islamic Jihad, the militant group announced an Egyptian-brokered truce will begin at 23:30 GMT on 7 August. Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid’s office confirmed the ceasefire.
 
A very well-informed and senior Arab official has informed me that the ceasefire was confirmed by the Islamic Jihad after a 45-minute phone call between a very senior Egyptian intelligence officer and his Iranian counterpart. The official noted “The Iranian side wanted the truce to happen as fast as possible”
 
What the source claims does not seem to contradict what is happening on the ground in Gaza. This quick conclusion of fighting is very inconsistent with previous rounds. Usually, Hamas and the Islamic Jihad refuse all offers for a ceasefire until some serious Israeli bombings have taken place. The reasons for this are simple; the leaders of both terror groups are rarely affected by the fighting. They and their families are either safe in bunkers underground or vacationing in either Jordan, Qatar, or Turkey. The second reason is that both, Hamas, and the Islamic Jihad are not free to make their own decisions. They receive orders over the phone from their masters who call the conditions of any ceasefires that serve their interests and not those of Gazans. In the case of the Islamic Jihad, the leaders of the terror group receive their orders directly from Iran.

Trained, financed, and promoted by Iran and her Arab friends, the Islamic Jihad is a de facto offshoot of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards. This means Iran is the one who has called the ceasefire shot. But why wouldn’t Iran let Gaza burn this time as it has always done? Why did Iran agreed to a ceasefire so quickly?
The answer lies in the way Israel managed the matter, which was quite different from the previous times and therefore has produced different results.
First, Israel took the initiative by arresting a senior Islamic Jihad figure in the ‘West Bank’, Bassam Al-Saadi. This helped demoralize the Islamic Jihad’s followers there and blocked their chances of causing any unrest in support of Islamic Jihad members in Gaza.
 
Second, Israel took the initiative by killing the most senior and capable military commander of the Islamic Jihad, Tayseer Al-Rajabi on 5 August. Then, immediately proceeded with very surgical and effective hits on installations of the Islamic Jihad in Gaza which left the terror group dumbfounded with the unprecedented and highly accurate strikes.

Third, Hamas never joined the fight on the side of the Islamic Jihad. My Arab intelligence sources who are very close to the situation in Gaza have confirmed to me the Egyptians and Qataris have both convinced Hamas to keep the truce they have sustained since January 2022. The sources claim Hamas leaders were told Qatar would go as far as freezing Hamas monthly funds if it was to break the truce with Israel. Hence, Hamas did not join the Islamic Jihad’s fight and left them to fend for themselves.
 
Fourth, Israel was upping its Gaza operations quickly and went beyond the curve by killing Tayseer Al-Jabari’s second in command, Khaled Mansour, “Commander of the Southern District in Gaza.” Mansour was much less capable and nowhere near charismatic as Al-Jabari, nonetheless, he was his potential successor.
 
With the Israeli hits becoming more painful and on target, Iran had no chance but to swallow its pride and seek a quick truce to save its terrorist assets in Gaza from being annihilated by Israel.

With the Islamic Jihad humiliated, its top leaders gone and its mentor, Iran, approving a quick ceasefire, it is safe to say Operation Breaking Dawn has been successful. This success must serve as a challenge to the outdated “conventional wisdom” by several Israeli governments of “Maintaining the status quo” and “Keeping the current leaders because you never know whom you are going to get if they are gone.”
The terror leaders ruling Gaza are a threat to the Gazans themselves, to Israelis and to the region. Targeting the head of the snake kills it. The lesson learned from this operation could be summed up with this verse of ancient pre-Islam Arab poetry:
“Do not you cut the snake’s tail and let it go,
If you are a man, hit it on its head then follow with the tail.”
Worth noting that there was a major call by Gazans for “a million-man march to topple the Hamas regime,” which was supposed to be launched on the 5th of August, the same day the operations began.
Mudar Zahran is the Secretary General of the Jordanian Opposition Coalition and an important Palestinian leader.

... continue reading.

Why did the Islamic Jihad agree to a ceasefire so quickly? Read More »

Iranian Lawmaker Says Western Guarantees Needed For A Deal

Member of the Iranian parliament’s foreign policy committe, Jalil Rahimi Jahanabadi
 
8/8/20223 minutes

Author: Iran International Newsroom

Iran will not surrender to any kind of threats, pressures or sanctions, a prominent lawmaker said Monday, while nuclear talks were taking place in Vienna.

Jalil Rahimi Jahanabadi, a member of parliament’s foreign policy and national security committee, told the government’s official news website IRNA that it is the West that should act “rationally” in the nuclear negotiations.
“We hope that the West will understand the Islamic Republic’s message,” Rahimi a member of the hardliner majority in parliament said, “because [we] will not dismantle our nuclear installations or reduce our [uranium] enrichment.” He vowed to keep the uranium, which Iran has enriched to 20 and 60-percent, and not accept international monitoring beyond the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, without the West giving a series of guarantees.
First, the United States and Europe must provide a guarantee not to leave the nuclear deal. They must also guarantee that oil export revenues reach the Iranian government.
Iran has been emphasizing the issue of a guarantee by the US to stay in a new nuclear agreement even before multilateral talks started in April 2021. Tehran’s argument is that former US President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew from the 2015 deal known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and Iran needs assurance that this will not happen again.
However, no US president can provide such a guarantee if an agreement is not a formal treaty, which would need Senate ratification – an almost impossible task with the highly controversial JCPOA.
Iranian officials have also demanded a host of other guarantees, including a pledge by the West that Iran would be able to attract foreign investments if it agrees to limit its nuclear program. The United States has promised to lift its oil export and banking sanctions, but no one can guarantee if Iran would receive foreign investments.
Rahimi told IRNA that the West does not realize that the world has changed and countries like China or Iran will not carry out their orders. “Iran, in terms of military, political and economic power is not a weak state to be subservient to the West, but Westerners look at the world as though it is still the 18th or 19th centuries…”
The Wall Street Journal on Sunday cited the European Union’s coordinator of the talks, Enrique Mora, as saying the negotiations to restore the JCPOA are close to completion, but it remained unclear whether Tehran will accept the final deal. The text of a deal could be closed in the coming hours, Mora had said. An unnamed Iranian foreign ministry official denied the report.
“Given the continuation of discussions on some remaining important issues, we’re not yet at a stage to finalize the text. “We believe that Vienna Talks can be concluded soon provided that the other party makes an appropriate decision. But we are not at that stage yet,” IRNA quoted the official as saying.
After sixteen months of negotiations, diplomats gathered in Vienna last week for what some said was a last-ditch effort to reach an agreement. Apparently, Iran insists on receiving guarantees and also demands that an investigation by the International Atomic Energy Agency of its past secret nuclear work be shelved.
Rahimi also said that despite its capabilities in enriching uranium, Tehran is ready for talks to resolve the issue but “the problem Iran has with Western countries is the degree of their understanding of global realities.”

... continue reading.

Iranian Lawmaker Says Western Guarantees Needed For A Deal Read More »

Kuwait names first ambassador to Iran in over six years

Sun, August 14, 2022 at 6:13 AM·1 min read

Reuters
URL: https://sports.yahoo.com/kuwait-names-first-ambassador-iran-131354442.html

FILE PHOTO: A general view of Tehran city, in Tehran KUWAIT (Reuters)

Kuwait has appointed an ambassador to Iran, both countries said on Sunday, more than six years after recalling its top envoy to Tehran in solidarity with Saudi Arabia after it severed ties with the Islamic Republic in 2016.

Ambassador Bader Abdullah Al-Munaikh handed his credentials to Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian in Tehran on Saturday, Iran’s foreign ministry said on its website. Kuwait’s foreign ministry confirmed Munaikh was appointed envoy to Iran.
Iran already has an ambassador in Kuwait.
The move comes as Sunni Muslim powerhouse Saudi Arabia works to improve ties with Shi’ite Iran, with which it has been locked in a rivalry that has played out across conflicts in the region
Riyadh broke off ties with Tehran in January 2016 after Iranian protesters stormed the Saudi embassy in Iran after Saudi Arabia executed a prominent Shi’ite cleric.
Kuwait recalled its envoy to Iran as other Gulf Arab states downgraded ties to rally behind Riyadh. Kuwait has maintained relatively good relations with Tehran under a foreign policy balancing ties with its larger neighbours.
The United Arab Emirates is working to send an ambassador to Iran as it seeks to rebuild bridges following years of animosity, a senior Emirati official said last month.
Saudi Arabia launched direct talks with Iran last year. The kingdom’s foreign minister has said there has been some progress in five rounds of Iraq-mediated discussions, but “not enough”.
(Reporting by Ahmed Hagagy in Kuwait and Parisa Hafezi in Dubai; Writing by Ghaida Ghantous; Editing by Nick Macfie)

... continue reading.

Kuwait names first ambassador to Iran in over six years Read More »

Rushdie attack reveals — again — true nature of Iranian regime

The Hill
August 15, 2022

BY JONATHAN SCHANZER, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR – 08/13/22 3:00 PM ET
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY CONTRIBUTORS ARE THEIR OWN AND NOT THE VIEW OF THE HILL

 

AP Photo/Joshua Goodman 
 
Author Salman Rushdie is tended to after he was attacked during a lecture, Friday, Aug. 12, 2022, at the Chautauqua Institution in Chautauqua, N.Y., about 75 miles (120 km) south of Buffalo.

On Feb. 14, 1989, Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued a fatwa, or edict, condemning author Salman Rushdie to death for blasphemy. Rushdie had recently penned the book “The Satanic Verses,” which depicted Rushdie’s interpretation of the life of the prophet Mohammed, including an episode in which the prophet was unable to distinguish between revelation and the influence of Satan.
More than three decades later, on Aug. 12, 2022, Rushdie was stabbed in the neck by New Jersey resident Hadi Matar, who reportedly was “sympathetic to Shia extremism.” The attack came amidst a flurry of other thwarted plots by the Islamic Republic against former U.S. officials and Iranian dissidents. While some may have seen it as ancient history, the Khomeini fatwa clearly still reverberates today.
In 1989, Khomeini sentenced Rushdie to death. On Tehran radio, the Supreme leader stated: “I would like to inform all intrepid Muslims in the world that the author of the book Satanic Verses, which has been compiled, printed, and published in opposition to Islam, the Prophet, and the Qur’an, and those publishers who were aware of its contents, are sentenced to death. I call on all zealous Muslims to execute them quickly, where they find them.”
In essence, Khomeini pitted Islam against the West. The following day was a national day of mourning in Iran. Crowds poured into the streets, stoned the British Embassy, and chanted “Death to Britain” repeatedly. A $2.8 million bounty was put on Rushdie’s head.
Three days later, American booksellers B. DaltonWaldenbooks and Barnes & Noble decided not to stock Rushdie’s book, while the book’s publisher, Viking/Penguin, closed its offices amidst bomb threats to install a new security system.
On the fourth day, Rushdie made the following statement: “As author of The Satanic Verses, I recognize that Muslims in many parts of the world are genuinely distressed by the publication of my novel. I profoundly regret the distress that publication has occasioned to sincere followers of Islam. Living as we do in a world of many faiths, this experience has served to remind us that we must all be conscious of the sensibilities of others.”
Ignoring the apology, Khomeini repeated his death edict the next day. On Feb. 20, the International Rushdie Defense Committee was founded in London by writers, booksellers, journalists and human rights groups who decried Iranian “armed censorship.” The day after that, the European Community withdrew their heads of mission from Tehran. Iran responded in kind. The Iranian parliament soon voted to sever all relations with the UK, where law had recently been passed condemning Khomeini for incitement, and another calling for Rushdie’s safety.
Elsewhere around the world, hell broke loose. Violent demonstrations, bomb threats, and clashes were reported in India, Germany, Thailand, Pakistan, Turkey, Australia, France, and beyond. Here in the United States, firebombs caused damage in two California bookstores. The U.S. Senate passed a resolution condemning the threats against Rushdie and his publishers, affirming its commitment to “protect the right of any person to write, publish, sell, buy and read books without fear of intimidation or violence.”

Violence continued through the spring of 1989. Muslims in Belgium were gunned down after speaking out against the fatwa on television. London bookstores were firebombed for carrying The Satanic Verses, amidst a spate of other clashes and demonstrations. Norwegian bookstores were set afire after releasing a translation of Rushdie’s book. A bookshop in Sydney was also firebombed.
That August, an adherent to Khomeini’s ideology accidentally blew himself up in his London hotel room. The Iranian-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon deemed him “the first martyr… who died while preparing to attack the apostate, Salman Rushdie.”
While Khomeini died on June 3 that year, his fatwa forced Rushdie into hiding for many years to follow. In fact, the continuity of enforcement of Khomeini’s edict cast a bright light on the Islamic Republic’s violent and intolerant ideology. It was one thing for this repressive regime to clamp down on the free speech of its own citizens. It was quite another to try and curtail the free expression of intellectuals beyond its borders.

The Iranian regime’s radical ideology has not changed in the intervening years.
If anything, it has hardened.
Intermittent attempts by Western governments to probe for signs of moderation have failed. This is the case even today. The attack on Rushdie comes amidst desperate diplomatic efforts in Vienna to encourage the regime to curb its dangerous nuclear ambitions. The regime has responded not only with this attack, but also several other plots targeting former U.S. government officials, such as former National Security Advisor John Bolton and former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and Iranian dissidents, such as journalist Masih Alinejad.

Doctors say that Rushdie will likely lose an eye. The nerves in his arm were severed. And his liver was damaged. Authorities are now working to determine whether the Islamic Republic ordered this attack, or whether it was merely inspired by the Khomeini edict.
Bipartisan legislation supports state and local cybersecurityViolent threats against the FBI make us less safe
In truth, this is a distinction without much difference. The illiberal and repressive regime in Iran unleashed chaos back in 1989. It continues to do so today. Whether ordered directly or inspired, these attacks on American soil must be met with resolve by our elected leaders.
This is not the time to yield billions of dollars in sanctions relief to the regime. This is the time for policies that isolate the Islamic Republic, along with warnings that violence against former officials, intellectuals and dissidents will not stand.

Jonathan Schanzer, a former terrorism finance analyst at the U.S. Department of the Treasury, is senior vice president at Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

... continue reading.

Rushdie attack reveals — again — true nature of Iranian regime Read More »

Nuke talks must lead to U.S. sanctions removal: Iran’s parliament committee

Xinhua, August 15, 2022

URL: http://www.china.org.cn/world/Off_the_Wire/2022-08/15/content_78371651.htm

TEHRAN, Aug. 14 (Xinhua) — An Iranian parliament committee said on Sunday that the talks on reviving a 2015 nuclear deal must result in the removal of U.S. sanctions in a way to safeguard Iran’s economic interests, the Iranian Students’ News Agency (ISNA) reported.
Abolfazl Amoui, spokesman of the Iranian parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, made the remarks after a committee meeting held to evaluate the latest round of the nuclear talks in Vienna.
The sanctions must be removed in a way to benefit the Iranian people and enable the country’s traders and businessmen to conduct transactions with other countries, he said, adding the Iranian government is duty-bound to present a report on sanctions removal to the legislative body for review.
The parliament will review the draft text being discussed in the Vienna talks, Amoui noted.
The European Union has recently put forward a “final text” of the draft decision on reviving the nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), awaiting political decisions from the other participants in the Vienna talks.
Iran signed the JCPOA with world powers in July 2015, agreeing to curb its nuclear program in return for the removal of sanctions on the country. However, former U.S. President Donald Trump pulled Washington out of the agreement and reimposed unilateral sanctions on Tehran, prompting the latter to drop some of its commitments under the pact. Enditem

... continue reading.

Nuke talks must lead to U.S. sanctions removal: Iran’s parliament committee Read More »

Decline of Zionist regime ‘very closer than ever’: Ghalibaf

MEHR News Agency
URL: https://en.mehrnews.com/news/190178/Decline-of-Zionist-regime-very-closer-than-ever-Ghalibaf

TEHRAN, Aug. 14 (MNA) – Iranian Parliament Speaker said that the decline of the usurper regime of Israel is very approaching and closer than ever under the auspices of unity, amity and empathy of all Resistance movements.

Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf made the remarks in an open session of the Parliament on Sunday and stated that the Zionist regime is on the verge of decline as time passes.
At the beginning of his speech, he congratulated the Islamic Resistance Day which is reminiscent of the resistance of the Lebanese Hezbollah Resistance Movement in the 33-day war and also the outset of a new chapter in the fight against the criminal Zionist regime.
He also praised the Palestinian Islamic Jihad Resistance Movement which managed to give a crushing response to the Zionist enemy.
The Islamic Jihad Resistance Movement proved that today each part of the Islamic Resistance alone has the ability to crush the deepest defense layers of the Zionist regime and smash their malicious will, he said, adding that under the shadow of unity, amity, and sympathy of all Resistance movements, it can be said that the decline of the usurping regime of Israel is closer than ever.
The atrocities and crimes of the Zionist regime are clear to everyone that the existence of this fake regime is threatening to spread insecurity, discord, terror, occupation and organized crime against people throughout the region, he added.

... continue reading.

Decline of Zionist regime ‘very closer than ever’: Ghalibaf Read More »

The “Cairo Declaration” Stresses The Need To Invest In Youth And Confront The Schemes Of Ideological Invasion

The Globe Echo World News
August 15m 2022
URL: https://globeecho.com/news/the-cairo-declaration-stresses-the-need-to-invest-in-youth-and-confront-the-schemes-of-ideological-invasion/

Last Updated Aug 15, 2022

The Forum “Arab Youth Talks to Build Awareness” recommended the need to invest in young people, develop their awareness and enhance their national affiliation, stressing the importance of awareness in order to confront the religious and cultural invasion, which promotes customs that contradict religious values, customs and traditions in Arab societies.

The first forum, “Arab Youth Talk to Build Awareness”, concluded its work in Cairo, after three days of sessions, in which 300 Arab youth figures, representatives of research centers, civil society organizations, youth councils and universities, some government agencies, the Egyptian Parliament, and the Youth Coordination participated in it. Parties and politicians in Egypt, representing 30 Arab, African and Islamic countries.
The forum, which was held under the slogan “Generations Supporting Arab Issues”, included intensive activities during the first day with the inauguration of the Arab National Authority for Building Awareness, through a session on the role of civil society institutions in spreading a culture of development and enlightened thought, while the second day witnessed the opening of the forum in the presence of Dr. Ashraf Sobhi, Minister of Youth and Sports and Head of the Executive Office of the Council of Arab Youth and Sports Ministers, Dr. Mushira Abu Ghali, founder and president of the Arab Youth Council for Integrated Development, and Dr. Talal Abu-Ghazaleh, the global economic expert, gave a televised speech to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, Antonio Guterres, and the Secretary-General of the Arab Youth Council for Integrated Development, Dr. Shafiqa Al-Amri. At the conclusion of the opening session, the forum honored the Arab Youth Council for Integrated Development, Dr. Ashraf Sobhi, on the occasion of renewing confidence in him as Minister of Youth and Sports in Egypt, and the presidency of the Executive Office of the Ministers of Youth and Sports, in addition to the forum dedicating a special session of the Arab Youth Council to honor influential Arab symbols, knights of building Arab awareness and symbols of national giving.
 

 

The forum witnessed rich discussions, through various, comprehensive and specialized sessions. The first session dealt with building awareness of the psychological, political and economic “concept and influence” on Arab societies, while the second session dealt with the role of religion, media and drama in influencing awareness building through several axes, most notably building awareness. In Islam and its impact on spreading the values ​​of peace and tolerance, the impact of drama on building awareness in Arab societies, and the role of the media in directing national and national awareness in the Arab world, while the third session witnessed “Unforgettable Positions of Arab Unity”, which dealt with the Egyptian-Jordanian relations model.
The work of the forum included a special session to present a model for youth role models in consolidating belonging, under the title, The Impact of Building National Awareness in Confronting Modern Generations of Wars “Egypt’s Model Before, During and After the June 30, 2013 Revolution” Decision and Choice, and a Dignified Life is the best humanitarian and development initiative to build a new Egypt, while The last session dealt with the role of social responsibility in building awareness of sustainable development through the axis: The role of economic and financial institutions in supporting awareness building to achieve sustainable development. The closing session of the forum witnessed the honoring of the partners of success and cooperation from the Ministry of Youth and Sports and the participating Arab delegations.
face invasion
The forum recommended the need to raise awareness of knowledge and religion to confront the ideological and cultural invasion, which promotes customs that contradict religious values, customs and traditions in our Arab societies, and coordination between bodies to combat intellectual deviation and its manifestations, adopting a real mechanism to confront it, paying attention to developing youth thought and advancing the culture of society, and maximizing attention to young people. And the development of real awareness among young people to avoid the false awareness broadcast by social networking sites.
In its recommendations, the forum stressed the need to combine Arab and African efforts to maximize investment in young people, develop their awareness of the issues of the country, enhance their national belonging to protect them from destructive and extremist ideas, expedite the establishment of the Arab National Authority to build awareness, and start the work of civil society institutions in publishing and implementing the forum’s outputs. .
Establishing awareness
The forum also stressed the importance of setting development programs and spreading enlightened thought among young people, taking into account the consolidation of the role of awareness among people of determination, noting that enlightened awareness requires attention to changing the educational curriculum and attention to technology and artificial intelligence to keep pace with the current changes and challenges, and to deal in a positive and purposeful manner. To build educational awareness. The forum’s recommendations pointed out that youth is an important social force, and that winning this vital sector by decision makers and politicians means winning the battle for change, calling for highlighting the role of young people who represent a model of constructive role models in various fields as they are the wealth of societies and their leaders in the future.
The forum pointed out that the Palestinian cause will remain the cause of the Arabs and the first Arab youth issue, pointing out that the role of youth diplomacy is no less important than political diplomacy in support of a just solution to the Palestinian issue, praising Egypt’s role towards the Palestinian cause and its contribution to stopping the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip and the Palestinian territories.

... continue reading.

The “Cairo Declaration” Stresses The Need To Invest In Youth And Confront The Schemes Of Ideological Invasion Read More »

Iran says Kuwait to send first envoy since 2016

Agence France-Presse
last updated: 14/08/2022 – 11:27 PM
Jordan News
URL: https://www.jordannews.jo/Section-20/Middle-East/Iran-says-Kuwait-to-send-first-envoy-since-2016-20522

(Photo: AFP)

TEHRAN — Kuwait has sent its first ambassador to Tehran since a downgrading of relations in 2016, Iran has announced. 

Kuwait recalled its ambassador and the UAE downgraded relations with Iran after Saudi Arabia that year cut ties with its regional rival, with Bahrain following suit.
That came after Iranian protesters attacked Saudi diplomatic missions in Iran following Riyadh’s execution of Shiite Muslim cleric Nimr Al-Nimr.
Badr Abdullah Al-Munikh, Kuwait’s new ambassador, has presented his letter of credence to Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian, the official IRNA news agency reported on Saturday night.
Saudi Arabia and Iran have had no diplomatic relations for six years, but have held talks, hosted by Iraq, since April last year in a bid to mend ties.
The UAE said in July it was “considering” appointing an ambassador to Tehran, which Iran said it expected “soon”.
About one-third of Kuwait’s local population belongs to the Shiite branch of Islam, as do most Iranians.
Read more Region and World
Jordan News

... continue reading.

Iran says Kuwait to send first envoy since 2016 Read More »

Turkey’s economic crisis coincides with new diplomatic initiatives

Al-Monitor — August 29, 2022 —-
Finding solutions: Turkey and the UN are pursuing diplomacy to end Ukraine war while Ankara is considering rapprochement with Syria and mending ties with Israel.
 

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan (L) and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky give a press conference following the talks with UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres in Lviv on Aug. 18, 2022. – DIMITAR DILKOFF/AFP via Getty Images

As economy struggles, Erdogan pursues foreign-policy achievements 
Turkey’s economy remains in a bad place. Just how bad? The country again lowered interest rates despite inflation reaching surging to an annualized 79% in July, Adam Lucente reports.
Unemployment is over 10%. Money is running out with Turkey’s occupation of northern Syria costing around $2 billion annually, according to The Financial Times, and the presence of 3.7 million Syrian refugees adding another $40 billion in fiscal burden.

Looking to create some successes to counter the distress, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is turning to foreign policy, reviving the “zero problems with neighbors” approach he’d taken before the Arab Spring over a decade ago.
Turkish initiatives in Ukraine, Syria and Israel reveal a foreign policy reset around economic and geostrategic crisis and opportunity.
Erdogan stands out for diplomatic focus on Ukraine
Erdogan was in Lviv, Ukraine, on Aug. 18, standing beside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, offering Turkey’s help mediating an end the war in Ukraine.
Turkey and Ukraine also signed a memorandum of understanding for Turkish assistance in Ukraine’s reconstruction.
“That the memorandum was signed on the day that the Turkish lira took a sharp plunge against the dollar following the central bank’s surprising decision to cut interest rates has not gone unnoticed on social media,” Nazlan Ertan reports.
Erdogan, who “walks a fine line between Russia and Ukraine in the Ukrainian war, met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Sochi on Aug. 5,” Ertan writes. “The two leaders’ statement that they’d further improve economic ties was followed by the Turkish president’s announcement in Ankara that five Turkish banks adopted Russia’s Mir payment system. The Turkish need for Russian gas, cash and tourists  — and Ankara’s unconcealed mirth over its growing economic ties with Russia — has led some European experts to refer to Turkey as a “black knight,” or a nation that helps in the evasion of international embargoes for its own benefit.”
Some of this requires perspective.
Turkey can only be a mediator by maintaining proper relations with both sides. And leaders are always looking out for the interests of their countries. Throughout the Middle East, and indeed most of the East, business and trade with Russia continues. Turkey is hardly an outlier on this score.
But beside Guterres, Erdogan is the only credible world leader putting any energy or initiative into trying to broker an end to the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
While a peace process will ultimately require the backing of the United States and other world powers, Turkey stands out for keeping diplomacy alive in the meantime — including by mediating, with the UN, the Black Sea Grain Initiative, which allowed the resumption of Ukrainian grain and Russian food and fertilizer exports.
And Erdogan still holds one of the most vital cards to be played in the conflict: approval of NATO membership for Finland and Sweden. Erdogan has said it is “out of the question” for the Turkish Parliament to approve their membership unless its conditions are met regarding significant changes to laws and policies dealing with Kurdish groups Turkey considers terrorists.
In Syria, Turkey inches toward rapprochement with Assad 
Meanwhile, Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu disclosed last week that he had met his Syrian counterpart, Faisal Mekdad, about the need to reconcile opposition forces with Damascus in the context of reaching a political settlement in Syria.
Cavusoglu also revealed that at their meeting in Sochi on Aug. 5, Putin encouraged Erdogan to consider meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad to bury the hatchet.
Putin has long advocated a rapprochement between Damascus and Ankara, viewing it as pivotal to any peace arrangement in Syria. Moscow even facilitated meetings between high-ranking Turkish and Syrian intelligence officials, but with little result.
Erdogan, speaking to reporters en route back from Ukraine, said, “For us, the issue is not about defeating or not defeating Assad,” adding that keeping dialogue channels open with Damascus is “necessary.”
The endgame envisioned by Russia would be a Syrian-Turkish understanding along the lines of an updated Adana Agreement, which restored bilateral ties and put the burden on Syria to crack down on any and all Kurdistan Workers Party activity in Syria.
The Russian president has so far not signed off on a new Turkish military operation into northwest Syria against Kurdish groups based there. Washington has also signaled to Ankara that it would not approve.
Erdogan is seeking to undo de facto Kurdish self-rule in northeast Syria and begin the process of returning 3.5 million Syrian refugees, who are considered a burden and threat by many in Turkey. He wants a wide “safe zone” along the border cleared of the primarily Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces. A deal with Assad could allow refugees to return to government-controlled areas in the rest of the country as well.
“The argument for peace with Damascus is clearly gaining weight in various echelons of the Turkish state,” writes Fehim Tastekin. “A number of prominent retired diplomats and military officers have long been advising reconciliation with Assad. And even neonationalist quarters that back the government’s belligerent stance against the Kurds have been pressing for peace with Damascus.”
Erdogan’s political calculation and political survival are also part of the mix, write Amberin Zaman and Sultan Al-Kanj. “Presidential and parliamentary elections are set to be held by June 18 next year. The Turkish economy, whose success for long years underpinned Erdogan’s own, is in a free fall. Anti-immigrant resentment is soaring. Random assaults on Syrians are growing common. The opposition says that as soon as it comes to power, it will ‘send the Syrians home.’ Hence, normalization with Assad ‘is a must.’ All of this is music to Turkish voters’ ears.”
The biggest hurdle to any reconciliation with Syria may be Assad, who feels vindicated and self-satisfied with the gradual expansion of Syria’s ties with several Arab states. He has insisted on Turkey’s withdrawal from northern Turkey and is unlikely to reconcile with Turkish-backed opposition groups as a condition for peace.
Salih Muslim, co-chair of the Democratic Union Party, which shares power in the Autonomous Administration in North and East Syria, told Zaman, “We have to take these moves seriously because the sides [Assad and Erdogan] are taking their orders from the same place — from Putin.” Muslim added, “The fact they are aligned against the Kurds is no surprise to the Kurds.”
Back to the future in Israel
Tel Aviv and Ankara have also patched up a long-running fractious relationship. “Israel and Turkey are not rekindling their affair, but they have resumed their friendship,” writes Ben Caspit. “There will still be ups and downs, but almost everyone agrees that the Israeli-Turkish reconciliation is here to stay for the foreseeable future.”
The road back included not just top-down diplomacy led by Erdogan and Israel President Isaac Herzog, but “unprecedented cooperation between Israel’s Mossad and its Turkish counterpart in response to intelligence about Iranian assassins sent to Turkey to kill or kidnap Israeli tourists,” Caspit adds.
By restoring ties with Israel, Turkey has found a back door into the potential benefits of the Abraham Accords while complementing its own rapprochements with Saudi Arabia and Bahrain.

Al-Monitor —
URL: https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2022/08/turkeys-economic-crisis-coincides-new-diplomatic-initiatives
August 29, 2022

... continue reading.

Turkey’s economic crisis coincides with new diplomatic initiatives Read More »