1

JaFaJ

‘Israel Is My State and the Palestinians Are My People,’ Government Minister Esawi Frej Tells TML

Israel Is My State and the Palestinians Are My People,’ Government Minister Esawi Frej Tells TML

MOHAMMAD AL-KASSIM
URL: https://themedialine.org/top-stories/israel-is-my-state-and-the-palestinians-are-my-people-government-minister-esawi-frej-tells-tml/
TheMediaLine.Org
08/15/2022

Esawi Frej, Israel’s regional cooperation minister, was born in Kafr Qasim, east of Tel Aviv, in 1963, the eldest of 12 children. His grandfather was killed by Israel border police in the 1956 Kafr Qasim massacre. An accountant by training and a member of the left-wing, Zionist Meretz party, he was first elected to the Knesset in 2013. He is Israel’s second-ever Muslim Cabinet member.

The Media Line: Thank you for taking the time to meet with us. First of all, I would like to ask you a question related to your presence in an Israeli government that was headed by Naftali Bennett, and the current government [headed by Yair Lapid], which are involved in many ideological and political contradictions. How do you explain your presence in light of where you come from, considering your party and your political thinking and ideology?
Esawi Frej: My answer to this question is very simple. Why do we serve in the Knesset? So we can watch? So we can deliver fiery speeches? We serve in the Knesset to change things, to serve a community. I want to serve my community. I want to change things, so I must be a partner in these decisions. I am part of a government because I am part of a coalition. In politics, there is a coalition and there is an opposition, and we are part of Israeli society. All the parties in the Knesset, Arab and Jewish, are Israeli parties that play the game of politics and run things. I see these things as normal. Being part of a coalition is a normal thing, but the unnatural thing is being part of this particular coalition, with the vast differences that exist within it. Right and Left together means there is a big ideological difference in principle.
TML: The government has many diverse, ideologically contradictory components. Let’s say the dominant character of the government is right wing, which means that if you do not believe, for example, in an increase in settlements, there will still be an increase in settlements. You believe in the two-state solution. The government under former Prime Minister Bennett did not even believe in talking with the Palestinians and their president. How are you serving in a government that doesn’t seem aligned with your ideology?
Frej: True, everything you said is true. We knew him before we entered the coalition, but we always considered the alternative. This is the government that we are part of, not the government of our dreams. This is not the government that I dreamed of. It is completely contrary to my principles, my political ideas, and the political agenda that I have been advocating for decades, but a politician is always faced with choosing between the available options in light of difficult circumstances, the current circumstances. We had a preliminary coalition agreement for the government to refrain from acting on all the issues that were against our ideological agenda. And there were internal conflicts within the government, with each party pushing to implement matters related to its agenda. In this regard, I recognize that this government is the most right wing in the history of the country. It put the Palestinian issue aside. It refused to negotiate with the Palestinians or discuss the issue. I know, I understand that, but we had no other choice. We had to try and influence things from within. Politics is not a science of precise calculations. Politics demands flexibility. You have to know how to react quickly. So, to everyone who directs criticism or questions, I ask him here: Tell me the solution, tell me the alternative. What is the alternative? The alternative was worse, which is why I am satisfied with what I did under the difficult circumstances in which we found ourselves.
TML: Is your decision not to run in the November 1 election final?
Frej: My decision now is that I do not need to return to the political arena. My goal is to make the Left-Center bloc succeed. My goal is to raise the participation rate in the Arab sector so we can be partners in this electoral battle. We can’t sit by and watch. Whatever serves this goal, I will be there. Currently, we are trying to arrange the cards because it is a collective responsibility of good people. The party requires collective responsibility. There are racist extremists with their policies based on hatred of the other. These are the people who are waiting for me; I must stop them. How do I stop them? I want to guarantee the success of democracy and the success of the Center-Left bloc. Let us be clear, without an Arab participation rate of at least 60%, this success is in danger. No one can change this fact. The Arabs make up more than 18% of the eligible voters in the country. Last time less than 50% of the Arabs citizens participated in the vote and the effect was clear. I am very worried that what happens next will be worse. At least in this government, it is true that there has been no progress on the Palestinian issue, and this is a painful thing, but on the internal level, this government did not incite against us as an Arab minority at home. Not like before. Before, all government policy was based on hatred and incitement against the Arab voter. We have not seen it in the current government. Yes, there is a lot that we can try to correct. Life is a process. Imagine, after 73 years an Arab party, an Islamic movement [The United Arab List or UAL], is part of a coalition in the state of Israel, the state of the Jews. Could you imagine it? This is change, a change at the heart of public opinion. This change after 73 years, we need time in order to internalize it.
 
Israel’s 36th government takes the traditional photo at the Knesset on June 14, 2021. Minister for Regional Cooperation Esawi Frej is in the top row, 4th from the left. (Avi Ohayon/GPO)

TML: But the Israeli Jewish community’s acceptance of the presence of this party within the government coalition was not great. There has been much criticism about the participation of [UAL Chairman] Mansour Abbas and the United Arab List into this coalition by the Israeli Jewish community, not the Arab community.
Frej: True, very true, every new thing begins with opposition, but consider the time factor. For 73 years, Arab voters, Arab parties backed the traditional positions, and it’s been the same story. What have we achieved? We have insecurity and violence in our streets; we have a person dying from crime every day. There is no personal security. What have we gotten? Poverty haunts us. Where are the achievements? Steadfast, steadfast, steadfast! What does it mean that I’m steadfast? Let’s try another approach, let’s try another way. Why are we, like ostriches, putting our heads in the sand and saying no? We are part of Israeli society, period, end of sentence. This is the truth; this is the reality, and that’s how we should behave. This is what is required. We are an Arab minority, part of Israeli society, and we must act accordingly. We wanted our Palestinian brothers and our people to have a country because Israel is my state and the Palestinians are my people. I want to connect them [Israel and Palestine] to ensure security for you, for them, and for me, too. Let’s not fool ourselves. For change, you must be part of the political game, not a spectator screaming from behind the fence of the stadium. I want to be a partner in the game. I want to be in the mix. Enough! So, we started to change this year. We did not miss the opportunity; even at the level of the budgets that were approved, the five-year plan [for the Arab sector] is 30 billion shekels [$9.26 billion]. In order for you to bring these sums to Arab towns and villages, you need to plan and approve programs and committees. All this process takes a year. We went through it, and it was time for implementation. I have the ministry; I see it with my own eyes. The time for implementation and the transfer of budgets came, the voices started to rise, and each one [politician] chose his words carefully. Why try to fool people? This government should have stayed in office another year. I agreed to be part of it, and that was the most difficult part of the approval process. If I agree, let me benefit. You entered the government; you should stop playing around. But personal matters and the egos of all these people, the parliamentarians, brought down the government. We have two Arab parties, the United Arab List and the Joint List. I ask myself, what does the Joint List want? What does the United Arab List want: The good of the Arab community at the internal level, and the two-state solution. Palestine and Israel, they want both. Mansour Abbas came and adopted a new approach with strong leadership, even though he did not know how it would turn out. The other party [the Joint List] started throwing abuse at him. Why? Why?
TML: So, you criticize the other approach?
Frej: Yes, for a simple reason. I grew up with the Communist Party. I voted for the Front [Hadash], a communist party, in the early ’80s – ’81, ’82. My first vote was for the Communist Party. I never forget this, my friends. We grew up on the idea of integration, part of Israeli society, Jews and Arabs, and two states for two peoples, and all these things. We grew up on these things. Then came Mansour Abbas and he said, okay, I want to take what you have said and become part of the coalition. Integrated. Why should I utter insult after insult at every opportunity? It is unacceptable. The guy took another approach. He said I want to serve my community through another approach. The plan that was for 73 years didn’t work. Let’s try something new. You can’t criticize every step [Abbas] takes for the sake of criticizing. What happened in the Knesset? The UAL entry into the government did two things on the political level: On the right-wing level, because the government is right-wing, and Binyamin Netanyahu wants to be the father of the right, [Netanyahu is saying,] “I am a right-winger,” so he must support the Kahanists and their ideas. UAL entering the [government] means Netanyahu works as a Kahanist.
TML: And this takes me to something I wanted to ask you. You are a minister in the current government, the second-ever Muslim minister in any Israeli government going back to the establishment of the state. Do you think that Israel is heading toward a radical change regarding the Arab minority in Israel, that it can participate in the government and in decision making?
Frej: It’s possible, but the situation in Israel is getting worse and very worrying. Because when I see opinion polls among the Jewish youth, and I see that the youth up to the age of 35 years, the largest party they support is Likud, and the second most popular is [Itamar] Ben Gvir’s [far-right party], I am forced to draw conclusions. The youth in Israel is heading toward the Right and toward extremism. This of course affects the youth on our side. Every extremism is met with extremism on the other side, action and reaction. I am concerned about this issue, but my first and main priority is the relationship of Arabs and Jews within the state because I see that every peace process, whether with the Palestinians or the Emirates or Morocco, without internal security and special and healthy relations between Arabs and Jews, won’t happen. Things have to go on. In my opinion, the most important thing for us in the country is the relations between Arabs and Jews. I mean, there are Arabs living in every Jewish town, in Tel Aviv, Jaffa, Haifa, Bat Yam, in every place, yes. It’s rare in Israel, very rare, to find a place where there are no Arabs, rare! Now there are thousands of Arabs living in Karmiel, Haifa in every place. The Arabs are part of the state’s mosaic. The relationship between Arabs and Jews should be a good, good, good relationship because I see myself there. Because if the mosaic guarantees this good relationship, it is possible for us to find peace agreements and expand the circle of security and peace; it will be easy for us if that happens.
 
Meretz Party lawmaker Esawi Frej, right, speaks during consultations with then-President Reuven Rivlin on forming an Israeli government on March 23, 2015. (Mark Neyman/GPO)

TML: You just returned to the country a week ago. Tell us about your visit to Morocco. It was not the first. What are the projects that you are undertaking as minister of regional cooperation? We have recently seen several other ministers from this government visiting Morocco.
Frej: Look, you go where you are wanted. You go where you find a warm reception. You go where you find a smile, you go where they invite you. Where they don’t invite you, you don’t go. Morocco has warm ties with Israel. Do not forget that more than a million Jews of Moroccan origin live in Israel. I mean, the relationship between the countries is based on friendship. Where the relationship is warm, it becomes stronger. Morocco will have a major and pivotal role in the region because of its closeness to Israel and the Palestinians. Peace between governments is a beautiful thing that starts from there, but in order to guarantee this peace and to feel this peace, there must be peace between peoples. How does peace between peoples happen? Through joint activities, mutual visits, discussions, all these things. I see myself how individuals respond to other individuals, community to community, business to business. Because if trust is built and there is trust between peoples, everything will be very easy. In Morocco, as part of my ministry’s activities, we had several meetings to build regional cultural, artistic, and theatrical cooperation, to strengthen the bond and the relationship between the two countries, and the familiarity of the societies with each other. If I contribute 1% to this effort, this is a big thing. I felt during my visits a desire and love from the people of Morocco to know us. I saw the extent of Morocco’s commitment to security and stability in the Middle East and the renewal of the peace process, and this is something that is important to me. And another point that is very interesting: This was in Morocco, a country with Arabs, Berbers and Jews.
TML: You will travel soon to the United Arab Emirates, to the city of Abu Dhabi. You go there regularly. You have good relations with Emirati officials and the head of state. What is the purpose of this visit? What do you want to discuss, and also tell us about the relationship between you and Emirati officials, and between the Emirates and Israel?
Frej: Look, you asked many questions with one question. I will answer one. We have a strong and solid relationship with the Emirates and the brothers from the Emirates and a common interest in a win-win situation. Indeed, I consider myself the son of the entire Arab world. I am Palestinian, I am Egyptian, I am Jordanian, I am Emirati, I am Moroccan, I am an Arab, the son of the entire Arab nation, and I believe we must support every peace process and rapprochement with any Arab country with all our strength because it is a guarantee for our existence. As the son of an Arab nation, I represent the entire Arab world here. The Emirates is an open country, a friendly country. I have been impressed in my visits to the Emirates and my interviews with Emiratis by the extent of the willingness to strengthen relations on the basis of mutual benefit.
TML: In what areas can cooperation advance between Israel and the United Arab Emirates?
Frej: Every field that can benefit the two countries. For example, the energy and water project that was signed with Jordan will benefit the Emirates, Israelis, Jordanians, and the whole region. There’s the issue of transportation and the Jordan Gate industrial zone in the North [spanning the Israel-Jordan border near the Jordan River Crossing/Sheikh Hussein Bridge]. This will recreate the Silk Road. It will build a new Silk Road, like the old one between Haifa and Jordan to the Gulf, and the UAE is a part of this plan. I am continually surprised by the Emiratis. The Emiratis are smart people. They consistently think about how to turn every commercial relationship into a link between people. Through my ties, I have strengthened my relationships with officials into strong personal ones. We hope that little by little − we will need a little patience − we can strengthen the relationship between individuals and create the proper atmosphere. I have faith in peace and the Abraham Accords, Palestine, the Emirates, and Bahrain.
TML: Peace between whom?
Frej: I am speaking about myself as an Arab. Take the word “normalization.” It is a positive word in every language of the world – “normalization of relations between individuals” − except for Arabic, where it is a bad word, demonized. But is there peace without normalization?
TML: Opponents of normalization say that the Palestinian issue must be resolved first, and then normalization?
Frej: It’s OK, let me answer them. For more than 70 years, we have not been able to reach solutions. I want to change direction. I want to make peace with the Arab countries and see if the solution comes through them. For 70 years, there has been no progress, I am not committed to one solution. I think there is room for progress if we change our approach. Countries have their interests, and everyone works for their interest. An atmosphere of peace must be created in the region because an atmosphere of peace prevails over an atmosphere of war. Let’s think how to bring security and stability in another way. There is a political movement called the Abraham Accords, and I want to be part of the political movement.

... continue reading.

‘Israel Is My State and the Palestinians Are My People,’ Government Minister Esawi Frej Tells TML Read More »

Qatar launches ‘Devotion to Gaza’ campaign

August 15, 2022
Middle East Monitor
URL: https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20220815-qatar-launches-devotion-to-gaza-campaign/

A tank truck raising Qatari flags transporting fuel for Gaza’s sole power plant arrives to the Rafah crossing in the southern Gaza Strip on June 28, 2021 [SAID KHATIB/AFP via Getty Images]
 

August 15, 2022 at 10:13 am

Qatar Red Crescent Society has launched a “Devotion to Gaza” campaign to collect QR10 million ($2.7m) to help rebuild homes destroyed during last weekend’s three-day Israeli offensive, Qatar News Agency has reported.
“The tragedy of Gaza persists, with recurrent wars and 15 years of blockade,” explained the society’s Secretary-General, Ambassador Ali Al-Hammadi. “Once again, Israeli occupation forces have attacked Gaza, causing the Palestinians there even more pain and suffering.”

The incessant air strikes destroyed people’s homes, he added. “Men, women and children were not safe. Listening to their voices, the society is extending a humanitarian hand from the people of Qatar to ease their pain and support them in very difficult conditions.”
The campaign will secure food, health, water and sanitation, as well as shelter. “The aim is to relieve the impact of the war, fostering Gaza’s resilience, and enabling recovery from this ordeal.”
During the latest Israeli military offensive against Gaza, 49 Palestinians, including seventeen children and four women were killed. Another 360 were wounded.

... continue reading.

Qatar launches ‘Devotion to Gaza’ campaign Read More »

Hezbollah’s precision strike missiles can hit any target across occupied territories: Nasrallah aide

Monday, 15 August 2022 2:08 PM  [ Last Update: Monday, 15 August 2022 2:11 PM ]
PressTV
URL: https://www.presstv.ir/Detail/2022/08/15/687419/Hezbollah%E2%80%99s-precision-strike-missiles-can-strike-any-target-across-occupied-territories–Senior-Nasrallah-aide

In this file picture, mock rockets are set by Hezbollah on the ruins of the Khiam prison, Lebanon. (Photo via Twitter)

 
A senior aide to the secretary general of the Lebanese Hezbollah resistance movement says the precision strike missiles that the movement possesses are capable of hitting any Israeli target at sea or on land, stating that the Tel Aviv regime is well aware of such military prowess.
Mohammad Yaghi, the executive assistant of Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, emphasized that the movement has an arsenal of precision-guided missiles that can strike all designated targets inside the occupied territories, the Arabic-language el-Siyasa news website reported on Sunday.
Yaghi went on to comment on the upshot of a potential military confrontation between Hezbollah and the Israeli military, saying, “I think the situation will be fully determined in the sea, on land and in the air within the initial hours.”
He stated that the Israeli regime is well aware of the military capabilities of the Lebanese resistance movement.

 
Nasrallah: Hezbollah stands at forefront of battle against Zionist enemy

The secretary general of Lebanon’s Hezbollah resistance movement has called his group the frontrunner of battle against Israel.

“We (Hezbollah) really mean what we state. We will never back down and renege on our pledges. The entire Muslim Ummah will be victorious if we emerge triumphant. Every victory notched up by the resistance front will surely bear the hallmark of sacrifices made by fallen resistance fighters,” Yaghi highlighted.
Commenting on indirect negotiations on the demarcation of Lebanon’s southern maritime border with the occupying regime of Israel, the Hezbollah official said, “Protection of Lebanon’s oil and gas resources is an absolute and bounden duty.”
“We will not allow the Israeli enemy to extract even a single drop of crude oil or a cubic meter of natural gas if we are not able to do so following a sea demarcation agreement in September,” Nasrallah’s executive assistant pointed out.
“Israel knows that we are serious about what the Hezbollah secretary general has already announced. We don’t have a problem with the breakout of a war as it will be decisive. We will achieve the lofty ideal of creating a robust economy once we start extracting oil and gas from our own energy resources,” Yaghi concluded.
Earlier this month, a senior Hezbollah official commended his group’s publication of a video showing Israeli vessels involved in offshore oil and gas industry at a disputed maritime area in the Mediterranean, stressing that Israeli officials will not sleep a wink if they find out about the actual extent of the Lebanese resistance movement’s military capabilities.

 
Israel has no choice but to recognize Lebanon’s right to tap maritime gas resources: Top Hezbollah official

A top Hezbollah official says the Israeli regime has no other choice but to recognize Lebanon’s right to its oil and gas wealth in the Mediterranean Sea.

 
“The video that Hezbollah’s War Media Department released a few days ago relayed a clear message to the Israeli enemy that the resistance movement is fully prepared, and has aimed its missiles at the Karish [gas field is disputed territory] and areas beyond that,” Sheikh Nabil Qaouk, deputy head of the executive council of Hezbollah, said at a ceremony in the southern Lebanese town of Bint Jbeil on August 3.
The high-ranking Hezbollah official underscored that Israeli authorities will be gripped by fear once they find out about his group’s preemptive measures against the regime’s strategic energy and military installations.
Hezbollah on July 31 published a video threatening the gas extraction infrastructure at the Karish offshore field, near a disputed maritime border between Lebanon and Israel.

 
Hezbollah: Flying drones to Karish gas field conveyed message to Israel

Lebanon’s Hezbollah says its recent flying of drones toward the disputed Karish gas field was aimed to convey a message to Israel.

The video footage, which also contains a rare glimpse of Hezbollah weaponry, was broadcast on Lebanon’s Arabic-language al-Manar television station.
It was issued by Hezbollah’s War Media Department, which the group uses to broadcast footage of military operations and battles, and contains images of ships involved in drilling for and extracting hydrocarbons, along with what appear to be their coordinates.
The video begins with the words of Nasrallah during a recent speech in which he warned that “playing with time is not useful” on the maritime issue.

Press TV’s website can also be accessed at the following alternate addresses:
www.presstv.ir
www.presstv.co.uk

... continue reading.

Hezbollah’s precision strike missiles can hit any target across occupied territories: Nasrallah aide Read More »

Islamic Jihad killed more Hamas terrorists in Gaza operation than IDF did

Two Hamas operatives were killed during Operation Breaking Dawn, neither of which were targeted by the IDF.
 

By MICHAEL STARR
The Jerusalem Post

 URL: https://www.jpost.com/arab-israeli-conflict/gaza-news/article-714829

Published: AUGUST 16, 2022 12:05
 

Ahmed Muhammad Afana
(photo credit: Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades website/screenshot)

Neither of the two Hamas operatives that were killed during Operation Breaking Dawn last week were targeted by the Israel Defense Forces, The Jerusalem Post learned on Tuesday.

At least one of the terrorists was accidentally killed by Islamic Jihad rocket fire, and the IDF is confident that it did not kill the other, but doesn’t know with certainty how the second operative died. This would likely mean that more Hamas operatives were killed by another terrorist organization by accident than by the IDF during the hostilities.

Both Hamas operatives that died during the three-day hostilities were soldiers in the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas’s military wing.

Mysterious death of Hamas operative
Muhammad Abdul-Majid Afana died under mysterious circumstances in Jabaliya around 4:30 p.m. on August 7, the last day of fighting between Islamic Jihad and Israel. Hamas published photographs of Afana, 33, in military fatigues and armed with a rifle, but didn’t say how he died other than “during the continuous Zionist aggression on the Gaza strip.”
On Thursday, the al-Qassam Brigades held a ceremony commemorating Afana, replete with posters and banners bearing his image. A near 11 minutes video showing Afana’s funeral and training with RPGs and small arms was also shared by the group.

A ceremony commemorating the death of Hamas operative Muhammad Abdul-Majid Afana on August 11. (credit: Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades website/screenshot)

The area where Afana died, Jabaliya, was the location of two incidents that were alleged to have involved Islamic Jihad rocket accidents. On August 6, at least nine people, including four children were killed by an Islamic Jihad rocket according to the IDF. Another incident in a graveyard on August 7 killed five civilians, according to Shehab News. The IDF claimed at the time that it was the result of a failed rocket launch, but on Tuesday, Haaretz reported that the deaths were caused by an Israeli strike and not by Gazan rockets as initially assessed.

Other Hamas terrorist killed by Islamic Jihad
On Monday, The Post confirmed based on an amalgamation of IDF, Hamas and Palestinian media information that al-Qassam Brigades operative and Hamas police officer Yasser Nimr Al-Nabahin was killed by a misfired Islamic Jihad rocket along with three sons in Bureij on the evening of August 7.
The IDF asserted in an August 8 briefing that Islamic Jihad had killed more Gazan civilians during Operation Breaking Dawn than Israeli forces. Spokesperson’s Unit commander Brig.-Gen. Ran Kochav informed that of the 26 civilians that died last week, 11 were killed in Israeli airstrikes, and at least 15 were killed by Islamic Jihad rockets. If the August 7 Jabaliya graveyard incident was the IDF’s responsibility, this assessment would be incorrect.

Gazan terrorist organizations launched around 1,100 rockets during Operation Breaking Dawn, according to IDF statistics. Almost 200 of these projectiles fell within the Gaza strip – almost a fifth of those launched at Israel.

... continue reading.

Islamic Jihad killed more Hamas terrorists in Gaza operation than IDF did Read More »

FM Vows to Uphold Iran’s Water Rights

August, 06, 2022 – 12:02  Tasnim News Agency
Politics news 

TEHRAN (Tasnim) – The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Iran will not budge an inch in the efforts to safeguard the country’s right to enjoy the share of water from joint and border resources, Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian said.
 

In a meeting with the members of the Iranian Parliament’s agriculture commission on Friday, Amirabdollahian outlined the Foreign Ministry’s activities during the past 11 months in regard to water diplomacy, environmental protection, the export of agricultural products and economic diplomacy.
Pointing to the plans to ensure Iran’s right to receive the share of water from the Hirmand and Aras border rivers, he emphasized that the Foreign Ministry will never abandon the efforts to protect even a single drop of water that Iran is entitle to get from the historical and border resources.
Amirabdollahian also noted that Iran has recently set up a joint water committee with Turkey for the first time to address issues relating to the share of water from the Aras river.
Last month, Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi assigned the ministers of Foreign Affairs and Energy to follow up on Iran’s water rights from the Hirmand river, saying, “The popular administration will not hesitate to pursue the rights of the nation in any way.”

... continue reading.

FM Vows to Uphold Iran’s Water Rights Read More »

Why did the Islamic Jihad agree to a ceasefire so quickly?

With the Israeli hits becoming more painful and on target,
Iran had no chance but to swallow its pride. Op-ed.

Mudar Adnan Zahran 
Aug 8, 2022, 10:14 PM (GMT+3) – Israelnationalnews.com 


On the third day of confrontations between Israel and the Islamic Jihad, the militant group announced an Egyptian-brokered truce will begin at 23:30 GMT on 7 August. Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid’s office confirmed the ceasefire.
 
A very well-informed and senior Arab official has informed me that the ceasefire was confirmed by the Islamic Jihad after a 45-minute phone call between a very senior Egyptian intelligence officer and his Iranian counterpart. The official noted “The Iranian side wanted the truce to happen as fast as possible”
 
What the source claims does not seem to contradict what is happening on the ground in Gaza. This quick conclusion of fighting is very inconsistent with previous rounds. Usually, Hamas and the Islamic Jihad refuse all offers for a ceasefire until some serious Israeli bombings have taken place. The reasons for this are simple; the leaders of both terror groups are rarely affected by the fighting. They and their families are either safe in bunkers underground or vacationing in either Jordan, Qatar, or Turkey. The second reason is that both, Hamas, and the Islamic Jihad are not free to make their own decisions. They receive orders over the phone from their masters who call the conditions of any ceasefires that serve their interests and not those of Gazans. In the case of the Islamic Jihad, the leaders of the terror group receive their orders directly from Iran.

Trained, financed, and promoted by Iran and her Arab friends, the Islamic Jihad is a de facto offshoot of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards. This means Iran is the one who has called the ceasefire shot. But why wouldn’t Iran let Gaza burn this time as it has always done? Why did Iran agreed to a ceasefire so quickly?
The answer lies in the way Israel managed the matter, which was quite different from the previous times and therefore has produced different results.
First, Israel took the initiative by arresting a senior Islamic Jihad figure in the ‘West Bank’, Bassam Al-Saadi. This helped demoralize the Islamic Jihad’s followers there and blocked their chances of causing any unrest in support of Islamic Jihad members in Gaza.
 
Second, Israel took the initiative by killing the most senior and capable military commander of the Islamic Jihad, Tayseer Al-Rajabi on 5 August. Then, immediately proceeded with very surgical and effective hits on installations of the Islamic Jihad in Gaza which left the terror group dumbfounded with the unprecedented and highly accurate strikes.

Third, Hamas never joined the fight on the side of the Islamic Jihad. My Arab intelligence sources who are very close to the situation in Gaza have confirmed to me the Egyptians and Qataris have both convinced Hamas to keep the truce they have sustained since January 2022. The sources claim Hamas leaders were told Qatar would go as far as freezing Hamas monthly funds if it was to break the truce with Israel. Hence, Hamas did not join the Islamic Jihad’s fight and left them to fend for themselves.
 
Fourth, Israel was upping its Gaza operations quickly and went beyond the curve by killing Tayseer Al-Jabari’s second in command, Khaled Mansour, “Commander of the Southern District in Gaza.” Mansour was much less capable and nowhere near charismatic as Al-Jabari, nonetheless, he was his potential successor.
 
With the Israeli hits becoming more painful and on target, Iran had no chance but to swallow its pride and seek a quick truce to save its terrorist assets in Gaza from being annihilated by Israel.

With the Islamic Jihad humiliated, its top leaders gone and its mentor, Iran, approving a quick ceasefire, it is safe to say Operation Breaking Dawn has been successful. This success must serve as a challenge to the outdated “conventional wisdom” by several Israeli governments of “Maintaining the status quo” and “Keeping the current leaders because you never know whom you are going to get if they are gone.”
The terror leaders ruling Gaza are a threat to the Gazans themselves, to Israelis and to the region. Targeting the head of the snake kills it. The lesson learned from this operation could be summed up with this verse of ancient pre-Islam Arab poetry:
“Do not you cut the snake’s tail and let it go,
If you are a man, hit it on its head then follow with the tail.”
Worth noting that there was a major call by Gazans for “a million-man march to topple the Hamas regime,” which was supposed to be launched on the 5th of August, the same day the operations began.
Mudar Zahran is the Secretary General of the Jordanian Opposition Coalition and an important Palestinian leader.

... continue reading.

Why did the Islamic Jihad agree to a ceasefire so quickly? Read More »

Iranian Lawmaker Says Western Guarantees Needed For A Deal

Member of the Iranian parliament’s foreign policy committe, Jalil Rahimi Jahanabadi
 
8/8/20223 minutes

Author: Iran International Newsroom

Iran will not surrender to any kind of threats, pressures or sanctions, a prominent lawmaker said Monday, while nuclear talks were taking place in Vienna.

Jalil Rahimi Jahanabadi, a member of parliament’s foreign policy and national security committee, told the government’s official news website IRNA that it is the West that should act “rationally” in the nuclear negotiations.
“We hope that the West will understand the Islamic Republic’s message,” Rahimi a member of the hardliner majority in parliament said, “because [we] will not dismantle our nuclear installations or reduce our [uranium] enrichment.” He vowed to keep the uranium, which Iran has enriched to 20 and 60-percent, and not accept international monitoring beyond the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, without the West giving a series of guarantees.
First, the United States and Europe must provide a guarantee not to leave the nuclear deal. They must also guarantee that oil export revenues reach the Iranian government.
Iran has been emphasizing the issue of a guarantee by the US to stay in a new nuclear agreement even before multilateral talks started in April 2021. Tehran’s argument is that former US President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew from the 2015 deal known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and Iran needs assurance that this will not happen again.
However, no US president can provide such a guarantee if an agreement is not a formal treaty, which would need Senate ratification – an almost impossible task with the highly controversial JCPOA.
Iranian officials have also demanded a host of other guarantees, including a pledge by the West that Iran would be able to attract foreign investments if it agrees to limit its nuclear program. The United States has promised to lift its oil export and banking sanctions, but no one can guarantee if Iran would receive foreign investments.
Rahimi told IRNA that the West does not realize that the world has changed and countries like China or Iran will not carry out their orders. “Iran, in terms of military, political and economic power is not a weak state to be subservient to the West, but Westerners look at the world as though it is still the 18th or 19th centuries…”
The Wall Street Journal on Sunday cited the European Union’s coordinator of the talks, Enrique Mora, as saying the negotiations to restore the JCPOA are close to completion, but it remained unclear whether Tehran will accept the final deal. The text of a deal could be closed in the coming hours, Mora had said. An unnamed Iranian foreign ministry official denied the report.
“Given the continuation of discussions on some remaining important issues, we’re not yet at a stage to finalize the text. “We believe that Vienna Talks can be concluded soon provided that the other party makes an appropriate decision. But we are not at that stage yet,” IRNA quoted the official as saying.
After sixteen months of negotiations, diplomats gathered in Vienna last week for what some said was a last-ditch effort to reach an agreement. Apparently, Iran insists on receiving guarantees and also demands that an investigation by the International Atomic Energy Agency of its past secret nuclear work be shelved.
Rahimi also said that despite its capabilities in enriching uranium, Tehran is ready for talks to resolve the issue but “the problem Iran has with Western countries is the degree of their understanding of global realities.”

... continue reading.

Iranian Lawmaker Says Western Guarantees Needed For A Deal Read More »

Kuwait names first ambassador to Iran in over six years

Sun, August 14, 2022 at 6:13 AM·1 min read

Reuters
URL: https://sports.yahoo.com/kuwait-names-first-ambassador-iran-131354442.html

FILE PHOTO: A general view of Tehran city, in Tehran KUWAIT (Reuters)

Kuwait has appointed an ambassador to Iran, both countries said on Sunday, more than six years after recalling its top envoy to Tehran in solidarity with Saudi Arabia after it severed ties with the Islamic Republic in 2016.

Ambassador Bader Abdullah Al-Munaikh handed his credentials to Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amirabdollahian in Tehran on Saturday, Iran’s foreign ministry said on its website. Kuwait’s foreign ministry confirmed Munaikh was appointed envoy to Iran.
Iran already has an ambassador in Kuwait.
The move comes as Sunni Muslim powerhouse Saudi Arabia works to improve ties with Shi’ite Iran, with which it has been locked in a rivalry that has played out across conflicts in the region
Riyadh broke off ties with Tehran in January 2016 after Iranian protesters stormed the Saudi embassy in Iran after Saudi Arabia executed a prominent Shi’ite cleric.
Kuwait recalled its envoy to Iran as other Gulf Arab states downgraded ties to rally behind Riyadh. Kuwait has maintained relatively good relations with Tehran under a foreign policy balancing ties with its larger neighbours.
The United Arab Emirates is working to send an ambassador to Iran as it seeks to rebuild bridges following years of animosity, a senior Emirati official said last month.
Saudi Arabia launched direct talks with Iran last year. The kingdom’s foreign minister has said there has been some progress in five rounds of Iraq-mediated discussions, but “not enough”.
(Reporting by Ahmed Hagagy in Kuwait and Parisa Hafezi in Dubai; Writing by Ghaida Ghantous; Editing by Nick Macfie)

... continue reading.

Kuwait names first ambassador to Iran in over six years Read More »

Rushdie attack reveals — again — true nature of Iranian regime

The Hill
August 15, 2022

BY JONATHAN SCHANZER, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR – 08/13/22 3:00 PM ET
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY CONTRIBUTORS ARE THEIR OWN AND NOT THE VIEW OF THE HILL

 

AP Photo/Joshua Goodman 
 
Author Salman Rushdie is tended to after he was attacked during a lecture, Friday, Aug. 12, 2022, at the Chautauqua Institution in Chautauqua, N.Y., about 75 miles (120 km) south of Buffalo.

On Feb. 14, 1989, Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued a fatwa, or edict, condemning author Salman Rushdie to death for blasphemy. Rushdie had recently penned the book “The Satanic Verses,” which depicted Rushdie’s interpretation of the life of the prophet Mohammed, including an episode in which the prophet was unable to distinguish between revelation and the influence of Satan.
More than three decades later, on Aug. 12, 2022, Rushdie was stabbed in the neck by New Jersey resident Hadi Matar, who reportedly was “sympathetic to Shia extremism.” The attack came amidst a flurry of other thwarted plots by the Islamic Republic against former U.S. officials and Iranian dissidents. While some may have seen it as ancient history, the Khomeini fatwa clearly still reverberates today.
In 1989, Khomeini sentenced Rushdie to death. On Tehran radio, the Supreme leader stated: “I would like to inform all intrepid Muslims in the world that the author of the book Satanic Verses, which has been compiled, printed, and published in opposition to Islam, the Prophet, and the Qur’an, and those publishers who were aware of its contents, are sentenced to death. I call on all zealous Muslims to execute them quickly, where they find them.”
In essence, Khomeini pitted Islam against the West. The following day was a national day of mourning in Iran. Crowds poured into the streets, stoned the British Embassy, and chanted “Death to Britain” repeatedly. A $2.8 million bounty was put on Rushdie’s head.
Three days later, American booksellers B. DaltonWaldenbooks and Barnes & Noble decided not to stock Rushdie’s book, while the book’s publisher, Viking/Penguin, closed its offices amidst bomb threats to install a new security system.
On the fourth day, Rushdie made the following statement: “As author of The Satanic Verses, I recognize that Muslims in many parts of the world are genuinely distressed by the publication of my novel. I profoundly regret the distress that publication has occasioned to sincere followers of Islam. Living as we do in a world of many faiths, this experience has served to remind us that we must all be conscious of the sensibilities of others.”
Ignoring the apology, Khomeini repeated his death edict the next day. On Feb. 20, the International Rushdie Defense Committee was founded in London by writers, booksellers, journalists and human rights groups who decried Iranian “armed censorship.” The day after that, the European Community withdrew their heads of mission from Tehran. Iran responded in kind. The Iranian parliament soon voted to sever all relations with the UK, where law had recently been passed condemning Khomeini for incitement, and another calling for Rushdie’s safety.
Elsewhere around the world, hell broke loose. Violent demonstrations, bomb threats, and clashes were reported in India, Germany, Thailand, Pakistan, Turkey, Australia, France, and beyond. Here in the United States, firebombs caused damage in two California bookstores. The U.S. Senate passed a resolution condemning the threats against Rushdie and his publishers, affirming its commitment to “protect the right of any person to write, publish, sell, buy and read books without fear of intimidation or violence.”

Violence continued through the spring of 1989. Muslims in Belgium were gunned down after speaking out against the fatwa on television. London bookstores were firebombed for carrying The Satanic Verses, amidst a spate of other clashes and demonstrations. Norwegian bookstores were set afire after releasing a translation of Rushdie’s book. A bookshop in Sydney was also firebombed.
That August, an adherent to Khomeini’s ideology accidentally blew himself up in his London hotel room. The Iranian-backed Hezbollah in Lebanon deemed him “the first martyr… who died while preparing to attack the apostate, Salman Rushdie.”
While Khomeini died on June 3 that year, his fatwa forced Rushdie into hiding for many years to follow. In fact, the continuity of enforcement of Khomeini’s edict cast a bright light on the Islamic Republic’s violent and intolerant ideology. It was one thing for this repressive regime to clamp down on the free speech of its own citizens. It was quite another to try and curtail the free expression of intellectuals beyond its borders.

The Iranian regime’s radical ideology has not changed in the intervening years.
If anything, it has hardened.
Intermittent attempts by Western governments to probe for signs of moderation have failed. This is the case even today. The attack on Rushdie comes amidst desperate diplomatic efforts in Vienna to encourage the regime to curb its dangerous nuclear ambitions. The regime has responded not only with this attack, but also several other plots targeting former U.S. government officials, such as former National Security Advisor John Bolton and former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and Iranian dissidents, such as journalist Masih Alinejad.

Doctors say that Rushdie will likely lose an eye. The nerves in his arm were severed. And his liver was damaged. Authorities are now working to determine whether the Islamic Republic ordered this attack, or whether it was merely inspired by the Khomeini edict.
Bipartisan legislation supports state and local cybersecurityViolent threats against the FBI make us less safe
In truth, this is a distinction without much difference. The illiberal and repressive regime in Iran unleashed chaos back in 1989. It continues to do so today. Whether ordered directly or inspired, these attacks on American soil must be met with resolve by our elected leaders.
This is not the time to yield billions of dollars in sanctions relief to the regime. This is the time for policies that isolate the Islamic Republic, along with warnings that violence against former officials, intellectuals and dissidents will not stand.

Jonathan Schanzer, a former terrorism finance analyst at the U.S. Department of the Treasury, is senior vice president at Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

... continue reading.

Rushdie attack reveals — again — true nature of Iranian regime Read More »

Nuke talks must lead to U.S. sanctions removal: Iran’s parliament committee

Xinhua, August 15, 2022

URL: http://www.china.org.cn/world/Off_the_Wire/2022-08/15/content_78371651.htm

TEHRAN, Aug. 14 (Xinhua) — An Iranian parliament committee said on Sunday that the talks on reviving a 2015 nuclear deal must result in the removal of U.S. sanctions in a way to safeguard Iran’s economic interests, the Iranian Students’ News Agency (ISNA) reported.
Abolfazl Amoui, spokesman of the Iranian parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, made the remarks after a committee meeting held to evaluate the latest round of the nuclear talks in Vienna.
The sanctions must be removed in a way to benefit the Iranian people and enable the country’s traders and businessmen to conduct transactions with other countries, he said, adding the Iranian government is duty-bound to present a report on sanctions removal to the legislative body for review.
The parliament will review the draft text being discussed in the Vienna talks, Amoui noted.
The European Union has recently put forward a “final text” of the draft decision on reviving the nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), awaiting political decisions from the other participants in the Vienna talks.
Iran signed the JCPOA with world powers in July 2015, agreeing to curb its nuclear program in return for the removal of sanctions on the country. However, former U.S. President Donald Trump pulled Washington out of the agreement and reimposed unilateral sanctions on Tehran, prompting the latter to drop some of its commitments under the pact. Enditem

... continue reading.

Nuke talks must lead to U.S. sanctions removal: Iran’s parliament committee Read More »