1

JaFaJ

In Change Of Tactics, Armenian Opposition Scales Back Protests

Armenia’s opposition stages a protest in Yerevan’s French Square on June 14.

YEREVAN — More than six weeks after the start of their “resistance movement,” Armenia’s main opposition groups have announced they will scale back almost daily demonstrations aimed at toppling Prime Minister Nikol Pashinian and instead focus on weekly rallies to build larger crowds of protesters upset over the government’s handling of the Nagorno-Karabakh dispute with Azerbaijan.
Ishkhan Saghatelian, one of the opposition leaders, said late on June 14 that many Armenians who were unhappy with Pashinian’s government have avoided participating in the protests, so a change of tactics was needed.
“We have not yet managed to get all those people to the streets and bring them to this square. There are still people who think this is a fight for power, for the return of former rulers to power,” Saghatelian told thousands of supporters rallying in Yerevan’s France Square, the site of the opposition tent camp.
The two opposition alliances represented in the Armenian parliament launched their campaign to oust the prime minister on May 1, two weeks after Pashinian signaled his readiness to recognize Azerbaijan’s territorial integrity and “lower the bar” on the status of Nagorno-Karabakh acceptable to the Armenian side.

They accused Pashinian of helping Baku regain full control of Nagorno-Karabakh after Armenia lost control over parts of the Azerbaijani breakaway region in a 2020 war that ended with a Moscow-brokered cease-fire monitored by Russian troops.
Opposition supporters have since regularly marched through the city center, blocking access to roads and the entrances to government buildings while repeatedly clashing with riot police.
The most serious of those clashes, which broke out on June 3, left dozens of protesters and police officers seriously injured.
Pashinian and his political allies have dismissed the opposition demands for his resignation saying the opposition has failed to attract popular support for regime change.

Saghatelian, who has been the main speaker at the protests, said that while the goal of unseating the prime minister has yet to be reached, the opposition has managed to “awaken society” and scuttle a “new capitulation agreement” with Azerbaijan. The protests have shown Pashinian lacks a popular “mandate to lead Armenia to vital concessions” to Baku, he said.
“We will definitely oust Nikol, but we will do that bloodlessly,” Saghatelian told the crowd.
The opposition, he added, has to “change the structure and tactic of our resistance movement in a way that will allow us to give it new impetus.”
They will now hold major rallies on a weekly basis and set up, in the meantime, new structures inside and outside Yerevan, he said.
Saghatelian said they will also keep fighting for the release of more than three dozen opposition activists and supporters arrested during the protest movement.
The vast majority of them were charged with assaulting police officers or government loyalists. Opposition leaders reject the accusations as politically motivated.
Nagorno-Karabakh, which had been under ethnic Armenian control for nearly three decades, is internationally recognized as part of Azerbaijan.
Pashinian, who said he had agreed to the 2020 cease-fire to avoid further losses, said he would not sign any peace deal with Azerbaijan without consulting ethnic Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh.

... continue reading.

In Change Of Tactics, Armenian Opposition Scales Back Protests Read More »

Armenia to set up National Guard

National Guard units in other post-Soviet states, like Russia, have been used to squelch protests. And critics see it as a means for the government to protect its power.

Ani Mejlumyan Aug 2, 2022

Armenia’s Internal Troops in 2014. (photo: police.am)

As part of a broad security sector reform, Armenia is planning to set up a new National Guard force aimed at protecting high-ranking officials and state facilities. 
The reforms also include establishing an Interior Ministry for the first time since 2002. They are part of a draft bill that was first introduced in January 2021 but has been revised since then and now is scheduled for a parliament vote in September.
Government officials have singled out the creation of the National Guard – a structure common to many post-Soviet countries that focuses on protecting state officials and facilities – as the most significant piece of the reform package.
The National Guard “will be responsible for maintaining public order and public safety,” said Ara Fidanyan, the deputy chief of the Armenian police, in July 12 testimony to parliament about the bill. “In particular, we are ensuring the security of various state agencies, organizations, important facilities, high-ranking officials, and foreign delegations.”
Analysts suggested that the move was motivated by the government’s decreasing popularity in the wake of the 2020 defeat in the war against Azerbaijan. Since then it has faced open rebellion from senior military officers and a sustained protest movement organized by the political opposition.
“The realities have changed for the government, they don’t have the support and sense of security they had back in 2018” when they came to power, said independent military expert Leonid Nersisyan. “Creating a department like this [the National Guard] can guarantee that they can gather loyal people around them.”
The National Guard that Fidanyan described resembles that set up by Russia in 2016, and officials have said that the security reform package has been discussed with Moscow, Armenia’s military ally.
Russia’s National Guard, known as Rosgvardiya, has played a key role in cracking down on protests in that country and has deployed to Ukraine to keep order in the areas that Russia has captured in this year’s war.
“Rosgvardiya didn’t do well in Ukraine but it sure did well in shutting down demonstrations,” Nersisyan told Eurasianet. It is against Armenian law to use the military domestically, which could be part of the government’s calculation, he said. “As for Armenia’s national guard, you can get loyal people, equip and pay them better. And also, if you ever need to break up a protest, you can use them instead of the military since the use of the military is illegal.”
Some saw the move as a means of enforcing the increasingly authoritarian turn the government of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has been taking.
“The creation of a structure like this is characteristic of autocratic states, and it’s usually done by the leaders of personalist regimes who restructure state institutions in such a way that they serve their personal interests, protect their personal power, and have people loyal to them personally,” military expert Karen Vrtanesyan told Eurasianet.
The new National Guard units will be formed by police forces now known as Internal Troops. Under current law, those forces are subordinated to the armed forces in time of war; the new law would keep them under the Interior Ministry, as is the case in Russia.
Armenia had an Interior Ministry until 2002, when it was dissolved and the police became an independent structure that reports directly to the prime minister.
“By establishing the Interior Ministry, we will not only make the structure more controllable but also increase its transparency and accountability,” said Andranik Kocharyan, the chairman of the National Assembly’s Defense and Security Affairs Committee, during the July 12 hearing.
But some analysts argue that the new structure could in fact do the opposite.
“Ideally having all these security and armed forces structures under a single ministry means not only centralized control over them but also more people to bear responsibility,” Nersisyan said. “But in reality, because there are more people responsible like heads of departments, ministers, the prime minister and then parliament, accountability gets diluted. Now there’s not one person to blame if things go south.”

Ani Mejlumyan is a reporter based in Yerevan.

... continue reading.

Armenia to set up National Guard Read More »

Azerbaijan Commemorates Mass Killing of Servicemen by Armenian Troops in Karabakh Region

By Ilham Karimli August 15, 2022
URL: https://caspiannews.com/news-detail/azerbaijan-commemorates-mass-killing-of-servicemen-by-armenian-troops-in-karabakh-region-2022-8-15-9/
Caspiannews.com

The Dashbashi strategic height located between the Jabrayil and Khojavand regions of Azerbaijan / Courtesy

Twenty-nine years have passed since the mass killing of Azerbaijani servicemen by the Armenian military at the Dashbashi military post in the Karabakh region. 
The incident, which took place on August 15, 1993, saw an Armenian armed group launch a sudden offensive on the Dashbashi checkpoint where 23 Azerbaijani servicemen were stationed. None of the targeted servicemen survived the attack as Armenia had twice the number of troops as Azerbaijan at the time.
Following the incident, the Armenian troops desecrated the corpses of Azerbaijani servicemen.
“My aunt’s son also died here. It was very strange. The post was surrounded, 23 soldiers were brutally killed and tortured. Some had their heads, arms and eyes removed from their bodies. They went over the corpses with a chain tractor,” said Farzali Hasanov, a resident of Jabrayil.
According to Jeyhun Mammadov, a member of the Azerbaijani parliament from Jabrayil, the Dashbashi military post was created to provide air defense support to Azerbaijani forces deployed in the area.
“In order to defend the Dashbashi position itself, an additional artillery guard post consisting of five people was created on Mulkadara Height, located on the other side of the highland. A total of 28 young servicemen were stationed at both posts,” Mammadov said. The post of Dashbashi was one of the most important posts for Jabrayil. That’s why Armenians attacked it massively in a pre-planned offensive at around 4-5 AM on the night from August 14 to 15 and captured the height.”
The mass killing of Azerbaijani servicemen in Dashbashi occurred during the First Karabakh War between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Following the Soviet Union’s dissolution in 1991, Armenia launched a full-blown military aggression against Azerbaijan, with the latter’s Karabakh (Garabagh) region being a key focus. The longest and deadliest war in the South Caucasus region ended with a ceasefire in 1994 and saw Armenia forcibly occupying 20 percent of Azerbaijan’s internationally recognized territories. Over 30,000 Azerbaijanis were killed and one million were expelled from those lands in a brutal ethnic cleansing policy conducted by Armenia.
The Khojaly genocide is considered the pinnacle of the massacres committed by Armenia against ethnic Azerbaijanis in the First Karabakh War. On the night from August 25 to 26, Armenia’s forces, backed by the Infantry Guard Regiment No. 366 from a then-collapsed Soviet army, assaulted the town of Khojaly, located in the Karabakh region of Azerbaijan. As a result of the attack, the Armenian armed forces killed 613 ethnic Azerbaijanis, including 106 women, 63 children and 70 elderly people, and took another 1,275 as hostages. Another 150 Azerbaijani nationals went missing, and their fates remain unknown to this day. A total of 487 people were injured, including 76 children.
Meanwhile, according to data compiled by the Azerbaijani government, 3,890 Azerbaijani citizens, including 71 children, 267 women, and 326 older adults, went missing during the same war. Baku has been demanding that Armenia assist in investigating the fate of those people, a request that remains unfulfilled.
On September 27, 2020, the decades-old conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan took a violent turn after Armenia’s forces deployed in the occupied Azerbaijani lands shelled military positions and civilian settlements of Azerbaijan. During the counter-attack operations that lasted 44 days, Azerbaijani forces liberated over 300 settlements, including the cities of Jabrayil, Fuzuli, Zangilan, Gubadli, and Shusha, from a nearly 30-year-long illegal Armenian occupation. The war ended with the signing of a tripartite statement on November 10, 2020, by Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia. Under the statement, Armenia also returned the occupied Aghdam, Kalbajar and Lachin districts to Azerbaijan.
The post of Dashbashi and the village of the same name were liberated from the Armenian occupation on October 20, 2020.

... continue reading.

Azerbaijan Commemorates Mass Killing of Servicemen by Armenian Troops in Karabakh Region Read More »

Iranian parliament commission passes prisoner swap deal with Belgium

July 31, 2022

A spokesman for the Iranian parliament’s national security and foreign policy commission says the body passed the bill embodying a treaty for the transfer of convicts between Iran and Belgium.

Abolfazl Amouei said the motion had been referred to this commission for review and approval.
Amouei said the proposed 22-point treaty was sent to parliament in the form of a bill to run its legal course after being approved by the Iranian cabinet in June.
The Raisi administration says it agreed to the bill given the need to put in place a judicial cooperation mechanism between Tehran and Brussels and to expand bilateral ties.
The Belgian parliament had earlier approved the prisoner swap treaty with Iran, but a court in the European country later put it on hold temporarily.
Under the deal, Iranian diplomat Assadollah Assadi who is under arrest in Belgium for allegedly orchestrating an attack against a gathering of the MKO terrorist group in Belgium with be exchanged with a Belgian national in custody in Iran for espionage.
Iran vehemently denies Assadi planned an attack on Belgian soil.

... continue reading.

Iranian parliament commission passes prisoner swap deal with Belgium Read More »

Azerbaijan’s FM and Blinken’s assistant hold phone talk

01 Aug 2022 22:27

News.az

On August 1, 2022, a telephone conversation was held between the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Azerbaijan Jeyhun Bayramov and the Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Karen Donfried of the United States of America, the Press Office of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs told News.az.
The current state of the post-conflict normalization process between the parties, Azerbaijan and Armenia, the tripartite declarations signed by the leaders of Azerbaijan, Armenia and Russia, as well as between the leaders of Azerbaijan and Armenia through the mediation of the President of the Council of the European Union, Charles Michel. As a result of bilateral meetings, they exchanged views on the implementation of statements.
Minister Jeyhun Bayramov brought to the attention of the other side the well-known position of Azerbaijan regarding the need to ensure peace and progress in the region, including the opening of transport and communications, the delimitation of the border of the two states, and the need to start work on the future peace treaty.
The minister noted the importance of full implementation of the obligations of the parties. In this regard, contrary to the commitments arising from the tripartite statement dated November 10, 2020, the Armenian armed forces have not been fully withdrawn from the territories of Azerbaijan and the inadmissibility of this has been emphasized.
During the telephone conversation, the next steps in the process of normalization between Azerbaijan and Armenia, issues on the regional agenda, as well as other topics of mutual interest were discussed.

... continue reading.

Azerbaijan’s FM and Blinken’s assistant hold phone talk Read More »

Ayman al-Zawahiri: Who was al-Qaeda leader killed by US?

BBC News – August 1, 2022
15 hours ago

Ayman al-Zawahiri, who has been killed by a US drone strike in Afghanistan, was often referred to as the chief ideologue of al-Qaeda.

Ayman al-Zawahiri, who has been killed by a US drone strike in Afghanistan, was often referred to as the chief ideologue of al-Qaeda.

An eye surgeon who helped found the Egyptian Islamic Jihad militant group, he took over the leadership of al-Qaeda following the killing by US forces of Osama Bin Laden in May 2011.

Before that, Zawahiri was considered Bin Laden’s right-hand man and believed by some experts to have been the “operational brains” behind the 11 September 2001 attacks in the United States.

Zawahiri was number two – behind only Bin Laden – in the 22 “most wanted terrorists” list announced by the US government in 2001 and had a $25m (£16m) bounty on his head.

In the years after the attacks, Zawahiri emerged as al-Qaeda’s most prominent spokesman, appearing in 16 videos and audiotapes in 2007 – four times as many as Bin Laden – as the group tried to radicalise and recruit Muslims around the world.

Bin Laden and Zawahiri formed the World Islamic Front for Jihad against Jews and Crusaders in 1998

His killing in last weekend’s attack in Kabul was not the first time the US had sought to target Zawahiri.

In January 2006, he was the target of a US missile strike near Pakistan’s border with Afghanistan.

The attack killed four al-Qaeda members, but Zawahiri survived and appeared on video two weeks later, warning US President George W Bush that neither he nor “all the powers on earth” could bring his death “one second closer”.

Distinguished family

Born in the Egyptian capital, Cairo, on 19 June 1951, Zawahiri came from a respectable middle-class family of doctors and scholars.

His grandfather, Rabia al-Zawahiri, was the grand imam of al-Azhar, the centre of Sunni Islamic learning in the Middle East, while one of his uncles was the first secretary-general of the Arab League.

Zawahiri became involved in political Islam while still at school and was arrested at the age of 15 for being a member of the outlawed Muslim Brotherhood – Egypt’s oldest and largest Islamist organisation.

His political activities did not, however, stop him from studying medicine at Cairo University’s medical school, from which he graduated in 1974 and obtained a masters degree in surgery four years later.

His father Mohammed, who died in 1995, was a pharmacology professor at the same school.

Radical youth

Zawahiri initially continued the family tradition, building up a medical clinic in a suburb of Cairo, but soon became attracted to radical Islamist groups which were calling for the overthrow of the Egyptian government.

In recent years, Zawahiri had become a remote and marginal figure, only occasionally issuing messages

 
When Egyptian Islamic Jihad was founded in 1973, he joined.

In 1981, he was rounded up along with hundreds of other suspected members of the group after several of them, dressed as soldiers, assassinated President Anwar Sadat during a military parade in Cairo. Sadat had angered Islamist activists by signing a peace deal with Israel, and by arresting hundreds of his critics in an earlier security crackdown.

During the mass trial, Zawahiri emerged as a leader of the defendants and was filmed telling the court: “We are Muslims who believe in our religion. We are trying to establish an Islamic state and Islamic society.”

Although he was cleared of involvement in Sadat’s assassination, Zawahiri was convicted of the illegal possession of arms, and served a three-year sentence.

According to fellow Islamist prisoners, Zawahiri was regularly tortured and beaten by the authorities during his time in jail in Egypt, an experience which is said to have transformed him into a fanatical and violent extremist.

Following his release in 1985, Zawahiri left for Saudi Arabia.

Soon afterwards, he headed for Peshawar in Pakistan and later to neighbouring Afghanistan, where he established a faction of Egyptian Islamic Jihad while working as a doctor in the country during the Soviet occupation.

Zawahiri took over the leadership of Egyptian Islamic Jihad after it re-emerged in 1993, and was a key figure behind a series of attacks by the group on Egyptian government ministers, including the Prime Minister, Atif Sidqi.

The group’s campaign to topple the government and set up an Islamic state in the country during the mid-1990s led to the deaths of more than 1,200 Egyptians.

In 1997, the US state department named him as leader of the Vanguards of Conquest group – a faction of Islamic Jihad thought to have been behind the massacre of foreign tourists in Luxor the same year.

Two years later, he was sentenced to death in absentia by an Egyptian military court for his role in the group’s many attacks.

Western targets

Zawahiri is thought to have travelled around the world during the 1990s in search of sanctuary and sources of funding.

In the years following the Soviet withdrawal of Afghanistan, he is believed to have lived in Bulgaria, Denmark and Switzerland, and sometimes used a false passport to travel to the Balkans, Austria, Yemen, Iraq, Iran and the Philippines.

In December 1996, he reportedly spent six months in Russian custody after he was caught without a valid visa in Chechnya.

According to an account allegedly written by Zawahiri, the Russian authorities failed to have the Arabic texts found on his computer translated and he was able to keep his identity secret.

In 1997, Zawahiri is believed to have moved to the Afghan city of Jalalabad, where Osama Bin Laden was based.

A year later, Egyptian Islamic Jihad joined five other radical Islamist militant groups, including Bin Laden’s al-Qaeda, in forming the World Islamic Front for Jihad against Jews and Crusaders.

The front’s first proclamation included a fatwa, or religious edict, permitting the killing of US civilians. Six months later, two simultaneous attacks destroyed the US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, killing 223 people.

Zawahiri was one of the figures whose satellite telephone conversations were used as proof that Bin Laden and al-Qaeda were behind the plot.

Two weeks after the attacks, the US bombed the group’s training camps in Afghanistan. The next day, Zawahiri telephoned a Pakistani journalist and said: “Tell America that its bombings, its threats, and its acts of aggression do not frighten us. The war has only just begun.”

In the years following Bin Laden’s death, US air strikes killed a succession of Zawahiri’s deputies, weakening his ability to coordinate globally.

And in recent years, Zawahiri had become a remote and marginal figure, only occasionally issuing messages.

The US will herald his death as a victory, particularly after the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan last year, but Zawahiri held relatively little sway as new groups and movements such as Islamic State have become increasingly influential.

A new al-Qaeda leader will no doubt emerge, but he will likely have even less influence than his predecessor.

... continue reading.

Ayman al-Zawahiri: Who was al-Qaeda leader killed by US? Read More »

5 Facts About Ayman al-Zawahiri, 9/11 Strategist And Bin Laden Successor

Ayman al-Zawahiri was one of five signatories to Osama bin Laden’s 1998 “fatwa” calling for attacks against Americans

WorldNDTV News Desk (with inputs from AFP)Updated: August 02, 2022 12:20 pm IST

Here are 5 facts about him:

Zawahiri grew up in a comfortable household in Cairo. He became involved with Egypt’s radical Islamist community at a young age and was reportedly arrested at 15 for joining the outlawed Muslim Brotherhood.
He was jailed for three years in Egypt for militancy and implicated in the 1981 assassination of president Anwar Sadat and the massacre of foreign tourists at Luxor in 1997. He then linked up with bin Laden in Afghanistan, becoming Al-Qaeda’s main strategist and serving as bin Laden’s personal doctor.
He was one of five signatories to bin Laden’s 1998 “fatwa” calling for attacks against Americans. Like bin Laden, he vanished after the September 11, 2001 attacks, surviving repeated attempts on his life and re-emerging after reports that he had already died.
But he stayed in US sights, with a $25 million bounty on his head for the 1998 Africa attacks. Zawahiri took command of Al-Qaeda in 2011 after US Navy SEALs killed bin Laden.
But during the decade the 71-year-old presided over the group, it never recovered its prominence, as the aggressive Islamic State group took the lead in the jihadist movement, seizing large swathes of territory in Iraq and Syria and declaring a caliphate.

... continue reading.

5 Facts About Ayman al-Zawahiri, 9/11 Strategist And Bin Laden Successor Read More »

U.N. body determines Palestinian Authority condones torture and ill-treatment against civilians

The Committee against Torture named the PA as negligent in preventing torture, ill-treatment within the West Bank and Gaza, and laid out a series of reforms for Palestinian leadership

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas speaks at the United Nations (UN) Security Council on February 11, 2020, in New York City.

SPENCER PLATT/GETTY IMAGES

 

By 
Matan Kogen

The Jewish Insider –  August 2, 2022

Last week, the United Nations Committee against Torture (CAT) — a subsidiary of the U.N. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) — convened in Geneva to investigate, for the first time, instances of torture and ill-treatment carried out or condoned by the Palestinian Authority (PA).
After the completion of the hearings, CAT released its findings on Friday in a 15-page set of concluding observations, in which the committee determined that the PA is liable for the torture and ill-treatment, and set forth recommendations as to how the PA can better ensure the well-being of Palestinian civilians.
The committee’s recommendations include: categorizing torture — which is currently considered a misdemeanor — as a felony; banning unlawful and torturous detentions; and creating a domestic commission to investigate any allegations of torture and ill-treatment. CAT also recommended the PA implement policies to democratize the Palestinian system of government, including safeguarding free speech.
In preparation for the hearings, CAT, which holds broad powers to probe incidents of torture and cruel treatment, reviewed a report submitted by the PA, as well as alternative reports submitted by a dozen American, Palestinian and Israeli NGOs, including Human Rights Watch, the Palestinian Coalition Against Torture, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem’s Clinic on International Human Rights and others.
Felice Gaer, former vice-chair of CAT and director of the American Jewish Committee’s Jacob Blaustein Center for the Advancement of Human Rights, told Jewish Insider, “One of the most important things a review can do is to raise cases because it clarifies government policy, and also causes the state to pay special attention to those cases thereafter.”
David May, a research analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, suggested to Jewish Insider that the PA has used the international body as a way to put more pressure on Israel. “When the Palestinians joined all the various [human rights] bodies […] starting in 2014, the goal was twofold,” he said. “One, to establish themselves as a state to try to gain international recognition without having the instruments of statehood — so, to essentially be granted statehood by the U.N., even though it doesn’t really exist on the ground — and the second part was to put the screws on Israel.”
While the committee’s investigation into the PA was “important to do,” May said, it pales in comparison to the U.N.’s outsized focus on Israel.
But while the various alternative reports cited several unique instances of torture and ill-treatment carried out by Palestinian governing bodies or their proxies, CAT discussed only the 2021 killing of Palestinian human rights activist and PA critic Nizar Banat.
Despite any issues regarding the limited scope of CAT’s inquiry into Palestinian acts of torture, former Israeli Ambassador to the U.N. Danny Danon told JI, “I think the [committee’s] report actually makes a strong point about what’s happening in the PA institutions, and it calls for a major reform to be required.” Danon suggested, however, that the implementation of effective reform would be highly unlikely.
Dina Rovner, legal advisor at UN Watch told JI, “We hope that the Palestinian delegation will implement the Committee’s recommendations, including on the definition and criminalization of torture in Palestinian laws, treatment of Palestinian detainees, and violence against women. Anyone who cares about human rights should fight for accountability from the Palestinian Authority on these issues, not just in terms of legislative changes but also in terms of enforcement.”
The next inquiry into torture and ill-treatment carried out by the Palestinian Authority will likely come at the International Criminal Court (ICC), to which the Israel-based International Legal Forum recently submitted an appeal.

... continue reading.

U.N. body determines Palestinian Authority condones torture and ill-treatment against civilians Read More »

Israel’s Gov’t Votes to Halt Financial Payments to Palestinian Authority Because It Pays Salaries to Terrorists

CBNNEWS.COM

Israel’s Gov’t Votes to Halt Financial Payments to Palestinian Authority Because It Pays Salaries to Terrorists

08-01-2022

CBN News

Israel’s security cabinet voted on Sunday to withhold 600 million shekels ($176 million) from the Palestinian Authority over the next year to counter the money the PA pays to terrorists and their families.
Dubbed “pay-to-slay,” the PA policy of paying salaries to terrorists and their families for attacking Israelis is considered to incentivize Palestinians to carry out terror attacks.
The monies will be withheld from taxes collected by Israel on behalf of the PA, mostly from Palestinians who work inside Israel.
 
Related

Palestinian TV Calls for the Murder of Jews in Extremist Videos

 
Israel passed a law in 2018 requiring the government to withhold the same amount of money from the PA as was estimated they would pay to terrorists and their families. But it must be reapproved by the security cabinet from time to time, The Times of Israel said.
Hussein al-Sheikh, secretary-general of the executive committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization, called the Israeli vote a “financial blockade” and termed it stealing Palestinian money “in a step that adds to the daily escalation in our cities, villages and camps and the legalization of our bloodshed,” TOI reported.
The vote came on the 20th anniversary of a significant terror attack. On July 31, 2002, terrorists murdered nine people, including five American students, and injured more than 80 others in a bombing attack at the Frank Sinatra Cafeteria on the Hebrew University campus in Jerusalem.

And now as a matter of policy, the PA is giving raises to the terrorists who perpetrated the deadly Jerusalem attack.
Four Palestinians from an eastern Jerusalem Hamas cell were arrested shortly after the attack in August 2002 and four more were arrested over the next four years.  The Hebrew University attack was one of a number that the same cell carried out.
According to Palestinian Media Watch (PMW), an Israeli research institute, terrorist salaries increase according to their time served.
So, four of the terrorists are now receiving a raise from 7,000 ($2,251) to 8,000 ($2,572) shekels a month. They also receive supplements to those payments based on whether or not they are married, how many children they have, and for being Jerusalem residents.
“In other words, as a reward for their participation in terror and as a reward for murdering tens of people, the PA has paid these 8 terrorists a cumulative sum of 8,022,600 shekels ($2,579,614),” wrote Maurice Hirsch, Director of Legal Strategies at PMW in his report.
***Please sign up for CBN Newsletters and download the CBN News app to ensure you keep receiving the latest news from a distinctly Christian perspective.***

... continue reading.

Israel’s Gov’t Votes to Halt Financial Payments to Palestinian Authority Because It Pays Salaries to Terrorists Read More »

Palestinian Authority raises payments to perpetrators of 2002 Hebrew U attack

i24NEWS
August 02, 2022 at 12:31 AM – latest revision August 02, 2022 at 03:21 AM

Olivier Fitoussi/FLASH90Students at the campus of “Mount Scopus” at Hebrew University, in Jerusalem, on April 19, 2021.

‘As we talk about reducing the conflict… this is just incompatible with the very concept of peace’

On Sunday, the 20th anniversary of a bombing in Jerusalem that killed nine people and wounded more than 80 others, the Palestinian Authority (PA) increased payments to the families of the imprisoned perpetrators.
In the midst of the Second Intifada, on July 31, 2002, an east Jerusalem-based Hamas cell carried out a bombing in the Mount Scopus campus cafeteria of Jerusalem’s Hebrew University.

Five of those killed were US citizens, in an attack that helped shape the Israeli-Palestinian conflict into what is it today.

In the 20 years since the bombing, the West Bank’s PA has paid the families of the attackers more than $2.5 million, in what some call rewards and others call allocations.

This month, as the convicted Palestinians reached their two-decade mark in prison, the PA is set to increase monthly payments to their families by 14.3 percent. Some see it as an automatic, incremental raise, while others consider it an active step to award terrorists for murder, in what is dubbed the “Pay to Slay” policy.
“It’s time for Israel to tell the international community that if you’re going to talk about peace and reach an agreement between Israel and the Palestinians, this cannot go on,” Dr. Emmanuel Navon, an international relations expert at Tel Aviv University, told i24NEWS.
“Even if we don’t talk right now about a political solution between Israel and the PA, as we talk about reducing the conflict and promoting common projects, this is just incompatible with the very concept of peace.”
Israel’s political and security cabinet on Sunday approved the deduction of approximately $176 million from the tax money that Israel collects for the PA, a recurrent response to payments to the families of prisoners and terrorists by Ramallah.

... continue reading.

Palestinian Authority raises payments to perpetrators of 2002 Hebrew U attack Read More »